T cell receptor display

ABSTRACT

A proteinaceous particle, for example a bacteriophage, ribosome or cell, displaying on its surface a T-cell receptor (TCR). The displayed TCR is preferably a heterodimer having a non-native disulfide bond between constant domain residues. Such display particles may be used for the creation of diverse TCR libraries for the identification of high affinity TCRs. Several high affinities are disclosed.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application No. 12/603,255filed Oct. 21, 2009, which is a divisional of U.S. application No.10/532,879 filed Apr. 25, 2006, now abandoned, which is a U.S. NationalStage application of co-pending PCT application PCT/GB2003/04636 filedOct. 30, 2003, which claims the priority of Great Britain PatentApplication No. 0226227.7, filed Nov. 9, 2002; Great Britain PatentApplication No. 0301814.0, filed Jan. 25, 2003; Great Britain PatentApplication No. 0304067.2, filed Feb. 22, 2003; U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 60/463,046, filed Apr. 16, 2003; Great Britain PatentApplication No. 0311397.4, filed May 16, 2003; and Great Britain PatentApplication No. 0316356.5, filed Jul. 11, 2003. These applications areincorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

SEQUENCE LISTING

This application incorporates by reference the contents of a 101,685bytes text file created on Feb. 3, 2016 and named 44172.02.2009_SL.txtwhich is the sequence listing for this application.

The present invention relates to proteinaceous particles, for examplephage or ribosome particles, displaying T cell receptors (TCRs), anddiverse libraries thereof.

BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION

Native TCRs

As is described in, for example, WO 99/60120 TCRs mediate therecognition of specific Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)-peptidecomplexes by T cells and, as such, are essential to the functioning ofthe cellular arm of the immune system.

Antibodies and TCRs are the only two types of molecules which recogniseantigens in a specific manner, and thus the TCR is the only receptor forparticular peptide antigens presented in MHC, the alien peptide oftenbeing the only sign of an abnormality within a cell. T cell recognitionoccurs when a T-cell and an antigen presenting cell (APC) are in directphysical contact, and is initiated by ligation of antigen-specific TCRswith pMHC complexes.

The native TCR is a heterodimeric cell surface protein of theimmunoglobulin superfamily which is associated with invariant proteinsof the CD3 complex involved in mediating signal transduction. TCRs existin αβ and γδ forms, which are structurally similar but have quitedistinct anatomical locations and probably functions. The MHC class Iand class II ligands are also immunoglobulin superfamily proteins butare specialised for antigen presentation, with a highly polymorphicpeptide binding site which enables them to present a diverse array ofshort peptide fragments at the APC cell surface.

Two further classes of proteins are known to be capable of functioningas TCR ligands. (1) CD1 antigens are MHC class I-related molecules whosegenes are located on a different chromosome from the classical MHC classI and class II antigens. CD1 molecules are capable of presenting peptideand non-peptide (e.g, lipid, glycolipid) moieties to T cells in a manneranalogous to conventional class I and class II-MHC-pep complexes. See,for example (Barclay et al, (1997) The Leucocyte Antigen Factsbook 2ndEdition, Academic Press) and (Bauer (1997) Eur J Immunol 27 (6)1366-1373)) (2) Bacterial superantigens are soluble toxins which arecapable of binding both class II MHC molecules and a subset of TCRs.(Fraser (1989) Nature 339 221-223) Many superantigens exhibitspecificity for one or two Vbeta segments, whereas others exhibit morepromiscuous binding. In any event, superantigens are capable ofeliciting an enhanced immune response by virtue of their ability tostimulate subsets of T cells in a polyclonal fashion.

The extracellular portion of native heterodimeric αβ and γδ TCRs consistof two polypeptides each of which has a membrane-proximal constantdomain, and a membrane-distal variable domain. Each of the constant andvariable domains includes an intra-chain disulfide bond. The variabledomains contain the highly polymorphic loops analogous to thecomplementarity determining regions (CDRs) of antibodies.

CDR3 of αβ TCRs interact with the peptide presented by MHC, and CDRs 1and 2 of αβ TCRs interact with the peptide and the MHC. The diversity ofTCR sequences is generated via somatic rearrangement of linked variable(V), diversity (D), joining (J), and constant genes

Functional α and γ chain polypeptides are formed by rearranged V-J-Cregions, whereas β and δ chains consist of V-D-J-C regions. Theextracellular constant domain has a membrane proximal region and animmunoglobulin region. There are single α and δ chain constant domains,known as TRAC and TRDC respectively. The β chain constant domain iscomposed of one of two different β constant domains, known as TRBC 1 andTRBC2 (IMGT nomenclature). There are four amino acid changes betweenthese β constant domains, three of which are within the domains used toproduce the single-chain TCRs displayed on phage particles of thepresent invention. These changes are all within exon 1 of TRBC1 andTRBC2: N₄K₅->K₄N₅ and F₃₇->Y (IMGT numbering, differences TRBC1->TRBC2),the final amino acid change between the two TCR β chain constant regionsbeing in exon 3 of TRBC1 and TRBC2: V₁->E. The constant γ domain iscomposed of one of either TRGC1, TRGC2(2×) or TRGC2(3×). The two TRGC2constant domains differ only in the number of copies of the amino acidsencoded by exon 2 of this gene that are present.

The extent of each of the TCR extracellular domains is somewhatvariable. However, a person skilled in the art can readily determine theposition of the domain boundaries using a reference such as The T CellReceptor Facts Book, Lefranc & Lefranc, Publ. Academic Press 2001.

Recombinant TCRs

The production of recombinant TCRs is beneficial as these providesoluble TCR analogues suitable for the following purposes:

-   -   Studying the TCR/ligand interactions (e.g. pMHC for αβ TCRs)    -   Screening for inhibitors of TCR-associated interactions    -   Providing the basis for potential therapeutics

A number of constructs have been devised to date for the production ofrecombinant TCRs. These constructs fall into two broad classes,single-chain TCRs and dimeric TCRs, the literature relevant to theseconstructs is summarised below.

Single-chain TCRs (scTCRs) are artificial constructs consisting of asingle amino acid strand, which like native heterodimeric TCRs bind toMHC-peptide complexes. Unfortunately, attempts to produce functionalalpha/beta analogue scTCRs by simply linking the alpha and beta chainssuch that both are expressed in a single open reading frame have beenunsuccessful, presumably because of the natural instability of thealpha-beta soluble domain pairing.

Accordingly, special techniques using various truncations of either orboth of the alpha and beta chains have been necessary for the productionof scTCRs. These formats appear to be applicable only to a very limitedrange of scTCR sequences. Soo Hoo et at (1992) PNAS. 89 (10): 4759-63report the expression of a mouse TCR in single chain format from the 2CT cell clone using a truncated beta and alpha chain linked with a 25amino acid linker and bacterial periplasmic expression (see also Schodinet at (1996) Mol. Immunol. 33 (9): 819-29). This design also forms thebasis of the m6 single-chain TCR reported by Holler et at (2000) PNAS.97 (10): 5387-92 which is derived from the 2C scTCR and binds to thesame H2-Ld-restricted alloepitope. Shusta et at (2000) NatureBiotechnology 18: 754-759 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,538 report using amurine single-chain 2C TCR constructs in yeast display experiments,which produced mutated TCRs with, enhanced thermal stability andsolubility. This report also demonstrated the ability of these displayed2C TCRs to selectively bind cells expressing their cognate pMHC.Khandekar et at (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272 (51): 32190-7 report a similardesign for the murine D10 TCR, although this scTCR was fused to MBP andexpressed in bacterial cytoplasm (see also Hare et at (1999) Nat.Struct. Biol. 6 (6): 574-81). Hilyard et at (1994) PNAS. 91 (19):9057-61 report a human scTCR specific for influenza matrixprotein-HLA-A2, using a Vα-linker-Vβ design and expressed in bacterialperiplasm.

Chung et at (1994) PNAS. 91 (26) 12654-8 report the production of ahuman scTCR using a Vα-linker-Vβ-Cβ design and expression on the surfaceof a mammalian cell line. This report does not include any reference topeptide-HLA specific binding of the scTCR. Plaksin et at (1997) J.Immunol. 158 (5): 2218-27 report a similar Vα-linker-Vβ-Cβ design forproducing a murine scTCR specific for an HIV gp120-H-2D^(d) epitope.This scTCR is expressed as bacterial inclusion bodies and refolded invitro.

A number of papers describe the production of TCR heterodimers whichinclude the native disulphide bridge which connects the respectivesubunits (Garboczi, et al., (1996), Nature 384(6605): 134-41; Garboczi,et al., (1996), J Immunol 157(12): 5403-10; Chang et al., (1994), PNASUSA 91: 11408-11412; Davodeau et al., (1993), J. Biol. Chem. 268(21):15455-15460; Golden et al., (1997), J. Imm. Meth. 206: 163-169; U.S.Pat. No. 6,080,840). However, although such TCRs can be recognised byTCR-specific antibodies, none were shown to recognise its native ligandat anything other than relatively high concentrations and/or were notstable.

In WO 99/60120, a soluble TCR is described which is correctly folded sothat it is capable of recognising its native ligand, is stable over aperiod of time, and can be produced in reasonable quantities. This TCRcomprises a TCR α or γ chain extracellular domain dimerised to a TCR βor δ chain extracellular domain respectively, by means of a pair ofC-terminal dimerisation peptides, such as leucine zippers. This strategyof producing TCRs is generally applicable to all TCRs.

Reiter et al, Immunity, 1995, 2:281-287, details the construction of asoluble molecule comprising disulphide-stabilised TCR α and β variabledomains, one of which is linked to a truncated form of Pseudomonasexotoxin (PE38). One of the stated reasons for producing this moleculewas to overcome the inherent instability of single-chain TCRs. Theposition of the novel disulphide bond in the TCR variable domains wasidentified via homology with the variable domains of antibodies, intowhich these have previously been introduced (for example see Brinkmann,et al. (1993), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 7538-7542, and Reiter, etal. (1994) Biochemistry 33: 5451-5459). However, as there is no suchhomology between antibody and TCR constant domains, such a techniquecould not be employed to identify appropriate sites for new inter-chaindisulphide bonds between TCR constant domains.

As mentioned above Shusta et at (2000) Nature Biotechnology 18: 754-759report using single-chain 2 C TCR constructs in yeast displayexperiments. The principle of displaying scTCRs on phage particles haspreviously been discussed. For example, WO 99/19129 details theproduction of scTCRs, and summarise a potential method for theproduction of phage particles displaying scTCRs of the Vα-Linker-Vβ Cβformat. However, this application contains no exemplificationdemonstrating the production of said phage particles displaying TCR. Theapplication does however refer to a co-pending application:

-   -   “The construction of DNA vectors including a DNA segment        encoding a sc-TCR molecules fused to a bacteriophage coat        protein (gene II or gene VIII) have been described in said        pending U.S. application Ser. No. 08/813,781.”

Furthermore, this application relies on the ability of anti-TCRantibodies or super-antigen MHC complexes to recognise the soluble,non-phage displayed, scTCRs produced to verify their correctconformation. Therefore, true peptide-MHC binding specificity of thescTCRs, in any format, is not conclusively demonstrated.

Finally, a further study (Onda et al., (1995) Molecular Immunology 32(17-18) 1387-1397) discloses the phage display of two murine TCR αchains in the absence of their respective β chains. This studydemonstrated that phage particles displaying one of the TCR α chains(derived from the A1.1 murine hybridoma) bound preferentially to thesame peptides immobilised in microtitre wells that the complete TCRwould normally respond to when there were presented by the murine ClassI MHC I-A^(d).

Screening Use

A number of important cellular interactions and cell responses,including the TCR-mediated immune synapse, are controlled by contactsmade between cell surface receptors and ligands presented on thesurfaces of other cells. These types of specific molecular contacts areof crucial importance to the correct biochemical regulation in the humanbody and are therefore being studied intensely. In many cases, theobjective of such studies is to devise a means of modulating cellularresponses in order to prevent or combat disease.

Therefore, methods with which to identify compounds that bind with somedegree of specificity to human receptor or ligand molecules areimportant as leads for the discovery and development of new diseasetherapeutics. In particular, compounds that interfere with certainreceptor-ligand interactions have immediate potential as therapeuticagents or carriers.

Advances in combinatorial chemistry, enabling relatively easy andcost-efficient production of very large compound libraries haveincreased the scope for compound testing enormously. Now the limitationsof screening programmes most often reside in the nature of the assaysthat can be employed, the production of suitable receptor and ligandmolecules and how well these assays can be adapted to high throughputscreening methods.

Display Methods

It is often desirable to present a given peptide or polypeptide on thesurface of a proteinaceous particle. Such particles may serve aspurification aids for the peptide or polypeptide (since the particlescarrying the peptide or polypeptide may be separated from unwantedcontaminants by sedimentation or other methods). They may also serve asparticulate vaccines, the immune response to the surface displayedpeptide or polypeptide being stimulated by the particulate presentation.Protein p24 of the yeast retrotransposon, and the hepatitis B surfacecoat protein are examples of proteins which self assemble intoparticles. Fusion of the peptide or polypeptide of interest to theseparticle-forming proteins is a recognised way of presenting the peptideor polypeptide on the surface of the resultant particles.

However, particle display methods have primarily been used to identifyproteins with desirable properties such as enhanced expression yields,binding and/or stability characteristics. These methods involve creatinga diverse pool or ‘library’ of proteins or polypeptides expressed on thesurface of proteinaceous particles. These particles have two keyfeatures, firstly each particle presents a single variant protein orpolypeptide, and secondly the genetic material encoding the expressedprotein or polypeptide is associated with that of the particle. Thislibrary is then subjected to one or more rounds of selection. Forexample, this may consist of contacting a ligand with a particle-displaylibrary of mutated receptors and identifying which mutated receptorsbind the ligand with the highest affinity. Once the selection processhas been completed the receptor or receptors with the desired propertiescan be isolated, and their genetic material can be amplified in order toallow the receptors to be sequenced. These display methods fall into twobroad categories, in-vitro and in-vivo display.

All in-vivo display methods rely on a step in which the library, usuallyencoded in or with the genetic nucleic acid of a replicable particlesuch as a plasmid or phage replicon is transformed into cells to allowexpression of the proteins or polypeptides. (Plückthun (2001) AdvProtein Chem 55 367-403). There are a number of replicon/host systemsthat have proved suitable for in-vivo display of protein orpolypeptides. These include the following

Phage/bacterial cells

plasmid/CHO cells

Vectors based on the yeast 2 μm plasmid/yeast cells

bacculovirus/insect cells

plasmid/bacterial cells

In-vivo display methods include cell-surface display methods in which aplasmid is introduced into the host cell encoding a fusion proteinconsisting of the protein or polypeptide of interest fused to a cellsurface protein or polypeptide. The expression of this fusion proteinleads to the protein or polypeptide of interest being displayed on thesurface of the cell. The cells displaying these proteins or polypeptidesof interest can then be subjected to a selection process such as FACSand the plasmids obtained from the selected cell or cells can beisolated and sequenced. Cell surface display systems have been devisedfor mammalian cells (Higuschi (1997) J Immunol. Methods 202 193-204),yeast cells (Shusta (1999) J Mol Biol 292 949-956) and bacterial cells(Sameulson (2002) J. Biotechnol 96 (2) 129-154).

Numerous reviews of the various in-vivo display techniques have beenpublished. For example, (Hudson (2002) Expert Opin Biol Ther (2001) 1(5) 845-55) and (Schmitz (2000) 21 (Supp A) S106-S112).

In-vitro display methods are based on the use of ribosomes to translatelibraries of mRNA into a diverse array of protein or polypeptidevariants. The linkage between the proteins or polypeptides formed andthe mRNA encoding these molecules is maintained by one of two methods.Conventional ribosome display utilises mRNA sequences that encode ashort (typically 40-100 amino acid) linker sequence and the protein orpolypeptide to be displayed. The linker sequence allow the displayedprotein or polypeptide sufficient space to re-fold without beingsterically hindered by the ribosme. The mRNA sequence lacks a ‘stop’codon, this ensures that the expressed protein or polypeptide and theRNA remain attached to the ribosome particle. The related mRNA displaymethod is based on the preparation of mRNA sequences encoding theprotein or polypeptide of interest and DNA linkers carrying a puromycinmoiety. As soon as the ribosome reaches the mRNA/DNA junctiontranslation is stalled and the puromycin forms a covalent linkage to theribosome. For a recent review of these two related in-vitro displaymethods see (Amstutz (2001) Curr Opin Biotechnol 12 400-405).

Particularly preferred is the phage display technique which is based onthe ability of bacteriophage particles to express a heterologous peptideor polypeptide fused to their surface proteins. (Smith (1985) Science217 1315-1317). The procedure is quite general, and well understood inthe art for the display of polypeptide monomers. However, in the case ofpolypeptides that in their native form associate as dimers, only thephage display of antibodies appears to have been thoroughlyinvestigated.

For monomeric polypeptide display there are two main procedures:

Firstly (Method A) by inserting into a vector (phagemid) DNA encodingthe heterologous peptide or polypeptide fused to the DNA encoding abacteriophage coat protein. The expression of phage particles displayingthe heterologous peptide or polypeptide is then carried out bytransfecting bacterial cells with the phagemid, and then infecting thetransformed cells with a ‘helper phage’. The helper phage acts as asource of the phage proteins not encoded by the phagemid required toproduce a functional phage particle.

Secondly (Method B), by inserting DNA encoding the heterologous peptideor polypeptide into a complete phage genome fused to the DNA encoding abacteriophage coat protein. The expression of phage particles displayingthe heterologous peptide or polypeptide is then carried out by infectingbacterial cells with the phage genome. This method has the advantage ofthe first method of being a ‘single-step’ process. However, the size ofthe heterologous DNA sequence that can be successfully packaged into theresulting phage particles is reduced. M13, T7 and Lambda are examples ofsuitable phages for this method.

A variation on (Method B) the involves adding a DNA sequence encoding anucleotide binding domain to the DNA in the phage genome encoding theheterologous peptide be displayed, and further adding the correspondingnucleotide binding site to the phage genome. This causes theheterologous peptide to become directly attached to the phage genome.This peptide/genome complex is then packaged into a phage particle whichdisplays the heterologous peptide. This method is fully described in WO99/11785.

The phage particles can then be recovered and used to study the bindingcharacteristics of the heterologous peptide or polypeptide. Onceisolated, phagemid or phage DNA can be recovered from the peptide- orpolypeptide-displaying phage particle, and this DNA can be replicatedvia PCR. The PCR product can be used to sequence the heterologouspeptide or polypeptide displayed by a given phage particle.

The phage display of single-chain antibodies and fragments thereof, hasbecome a routine means of studying the binding characteristics of thesepolypeptides. There are numerous books available that review phagedisplay techniques and the biology of the bacteriophage. (See, forexample, Phage Display—A Laboratory Manual, Barbas et al., (2001) ColdSpring Harbour Laboratory Press).

A third phage display method (Method C) relies on the fact thatheterologous polypeptides having a cysteine residue at a desiredlocation can be expressed in a soluble form by a phagemid or phagegenome, and caused to associate with a modified phage surface proteinalso having a cysteine residue at a surface exposed position, via theformation of a disulphide linkage between the two cysteines. WO 01/05950details the use of this alternative linkage method for the expression ofsingle-chain antibody-derived peptides.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Native TCR's are heterodimers which have lengthy transmembrane domainswhich are essential to maintain their stability as functional dimers. Asdiscussed above, TCRs are useful for research and therapeutic purposesin their soluble forms so display of the insoluble native form haslittle utility. On the other hand, soluble stable forms of TCRs haveproved difficult to design, and since most display methods appear tohave been described only for monomeric peptides and polypeptides,display methods suitable for soluble dimeric TCRs have not beeninvestigated. Furthermore, since the functionality of the displayed TCRdepends on proper association of the variable domains of the TCR dimer,successful display of a functional dimeric TCR is not trivial.

WO 99/18129 contains the statement: “DNA constructs encoding the sc-TCRfusion proteins can be used to make a bacteriophage display library inaccordance with methods described in pending U.S. application Ser. No.08/813,781 filed on Mar. 7, 1997, the disclosure of which isincorporated herein by reference.”, but no actual description of suchdisplay is included in this application. However, The inventors of thisapplication published a paper (Weidanz (1998) J Immunol Methods 22159-76) that demonstrates the display of two murine scTCRs on phageparticles.

WO 01/62908 discloses methods for the phage display of scTCRs andscTCR/Ig fusion proteins. However, the functionality (specific pMHCbinding) of the constructs disclosed was not assessed.

Finally, a retrovirus-mediated method for the display of diverse TCRlibraries on the surface of immature T cells has been demonstrated for amurine TCR. The library of mutated TCRs displayed of the surface of theimmature T cells was screened by flow cytometry using pMHC tetramers,and this lead to the identification TCR variants that were eitherspecific for the cognate pMHC, or a variant thereof. (Helmut et al.,(2000) PNAS 97 (26) 14578-14583)

This invention is based in part on the finding that single chain anddimeric TCRs can be expressed as surface fusions to proteinaceousparticles, and makes available proteinaceous particles displayingalpha/beta-analogue and gamma/delta-analogue scTCR and dTCR constructs.The proteinaceous particles on which the TCRs are displayed includeself-aggregating particle-forming proteins, phage, virus-derived,ribosome particles and cells with a cell surface protein or polypeptidemolecules to which the TCR is covalently linked. Such proteinaceousparticle-displayed TCRs are useful for purification and screeningpurposes, particularly as a diverse library of particle displayed TCRsfor biopanning to identify TCRs with desirable characteristics such ashigh affinity for the target MHC-peptide complex. In the latterconnection, particle-displayed scTCRs may be useful for identificationof the desired TCR, but that information may be better applied to theconstruction of analogous dimeric TCRs for ultimate use in therapy. Theinvention also includes high affinity TCRs identifiable by thesemethods.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In one broad aspect, he present invention provides a proteinaceousparticle displaying on its surface a T-cell receptor (TCR),characterised in that

-   -   (i) the proteinaceous particle is a ribosome and the TCR is a        single chain TCR (scTCR) polypeptide, or dimeric TCR (dTCR)        polypeptide pair, or    -   (ii) the proteinaceous particle is a phage particle, or a cell        with cell surface protein or polypeptide molecules to which the        TCR is covalently linked, and the TCR is a human scTCR or a        human dTCR polypeptide pair, or    -   (iii) the proteinaceous particle is a phage particle, or a cell        with cell surface protein or polypeptide molecules to which the        TCR is covalently linked, and the TCR is a non-human dTCR        polypeptide pair, or    -   (iv) the proteinaceous particle is a phage particle, or a cell        with cell surface protein or polypeptide molecules to which the        TCR is covalently linked, and the TCR is a scTCR polypeptide        comprising TCR amino acid sequences corresponding to        extracellular constant and variable domain sequences present in        native TCR chains and a linker sequence, the latter linking a        variable domain sequence corresponding to that of one chain of a        native TCR to a constant domain sequence corresponding to a        constant domain sequence of another native TCR chain, and a        disulfide bond which has no equivalent in native T cell        receptors links residues of the constant domain sequences.

In one preferred embodiment, the invention provides A proteinaceousparticle, displaying on its surface a dimeric T-cell receptor (dTCR)polypeptide pair, or a single chain T-cell receptor (scTCR) polypeptidewherein the dTCR polypeptide pair is constituted by TCR amino acidsequences corresponding to extracellular constant and variable domainsequences present in native TCR chains, and the scTCR is constituted byTCR amino acid sequences corresponding to extracellular constant andvariable domain sequences present in native TCR chains and a linkersequence, the latter linking a variable domain sequence corresponding tothat of one chain of a native TCR to a constant domain sequencecorresponding to a constant domain sequence of another native TCR chain;wherein the variable domain sequences of the dTCR polypeptide pair orscTCR polypeptide are mutually orientated substantially as in nativeTCRs, and in the case of the scTCR polypeptide a disulfide bond whichhas no equivalent in native T cell receptors links residues of thepolypeptide.

In the case of αβ scTCRs or dTCRs displayed according to the invention,a requirement that the variable domain sequences of the α and β segmentsare mutually orientated substantially as in native αβ T cell receptorsis merely an alternative way of saying that the TCRs are functional, andthis can be tested by confirming that the molecule binds to the relevantTCR ligand (pMHC complex, CD1-antigen complex, superantigen orsuperantigen/pMHC complex)—if it binds, then the requirement is met.Interactions with pMHC complexes can be measured using a Biacore 3000™or Biacore 2000™ instrument. WO99/6120 provides detailed descriptions ofthe methods required to analyse TCR binding to MHC-peptide complexes.These methods are equally applicable to the study of TCR/CD1 andTCR/superantigen interactions. In order to apply these methods to thestudy of TCR/CD1 interactions soluble forms of CD1 are required, theproduction of which are described in (Bauer (1997) Eur J Immunol 27 (6)1366-1373). In the case of γδ TCRs of the present invention the cognateligands for these molecules are unknown therefore secondary means ofverifying their conformation such as recognition by antibodies can beemployed. The monoclonal antibody MCA991T (available from Serotec),specific for the δ chain variable region, is an example of an antibodyappropriate for this task.

The scTCRs or dTCRs of the present invention may be displayed onproteinaceous particles, for example phage particles, preferablyfilamentous phage particles, by, for example, the following two means:

-   -   (i) The C-terminus of one member of the dTCR polypeptide pair,        or the C-terminus of the scTCR polypeptide, or the C-terminus of        a short peptide linker attached to the C-terminus of either, can        be directly linked by a peptide bond to a surface exposed        residue of the proteinaceous particle. For example, the said        surface exposed residue is preferably at the N-terminus of the        gene product of bacteriophage gene III or gene VIII; and    -   (ii) The C-terminus of one member of the dTCR polypeptide pair,        or the C-terminus of the scTCR polypeptide, or the C-terminus of        a short peptide linker attached to the C-terminus of either, is        linked by a disulfide bond to a surface exposed cysteine residue        of the proteinaceous particle via an introduced cysteine        residue. For example, the said surface exposed residue is again        preferably at the N-terminus of the gene product of        bacteriophage gene III or gene VIII.

Method (i) above is preferred. In the case of a scTCR, nucleic acidencoding the TCR may be fused to nucleic acid encoding the particleforming protein or a surface protein of the replicable particle such asa phage or cell. Alternatively, nucleic acid representing mRNA butwithout a stop codon, or fused to puromycin RNA may be translated byribosome such that the TCR remains fused to the ribosome particle. Inthe case of a dTCR, nucleic acid encoding one chain of the TCR may befused to nucleic acid encoding the particle forming protein or a cellsurface protein of the replicable particle such as a phage or cell, andthe second chain of the TCR polypeptide pair may be allowed to associatewith the resultant expressed particle displaying the first chain. Properfunctional association of the two chains may be assisted by the presenceof cysteines in the constant domain of the two chains which are capableof forming an interchain disulfide bond, as more fully discussed below.

The Displayed scTCR

The displayed scTCR polypeptide may be, for example, one which has

-   -   a first segment constituted by an amino acid sequence        corresponding to a TCR α or β chain variable domain sequence        fused to the N terminus of an amino acid sequence corresponding        to α TCR a chain constant domain extracellular sequence,    -   a second segment constituted by an amino acid sequence        corresponding to a TCR β or γ chain variable domain fused to the        N terminus of an amino acid sequence corresponding to TCR β        chain constant domain extracellular sequence,    -   a linker sequence linking the C terminus of the first segment to        the N terminus of the second segment, or vice versa, and    -   a disulfide bond between the first and second chains, said        disulfide bond being one which has no equivalent in native αβ or        γδ T cell receptors,    -   the length of the linker sequence and the position of the        disulfide bond being such that the variable domain sequences of        the first and second segments are mutually orientated        substantially as in native αβ or γδ T cell receptors.

Alternatively, the displayed scTCR may be one which has

-   -   a first segment constituted by an amino acid sequence        corresponding to a TCR α or δ chain variable domain    -   a second segment constituted by an amino acid sequence        corresponding to a TCR β or γ chain variable domain sequence        fused to the N terminus of an amino acid sequence corresponding        to a TCR β chain constant domain extracellular sequence, and    -   a linker sequence linking the C terminus of the first segment to        the N terminus of the second segment,        PROVIDED THAT where the proteinaceous particle is a phage, the        scTCR corresponds to a human TCR; or

One which has

-   -   a first segment constituted by an amino acid sequence        corresponding to a TCR β or γ chain variable domain    -   a second segment constituted by an amino acid sequence        corresponding to a TCR α or δ chain variable domain sequence        fused to the N terminus of an amino acid sequence corresponding        to a TCR α chain constant domain extracellular sequence, and    -   a linker sequence linking the C terminus of the first segment to        the N terminus of the second segment        PROVIDED THAT where the proteinaceous particle is a phage, the        scTCR corresponds to a human TCR.        The Displayed dTCR

The dTCR which is displayed on the proteinaceous particle may be onewhich is constituted by

-   -   a first polypeptide wherein a sequence corresponding to a TCR α        or γ chain variable region sequence is fused to the N terminus        of a sequence corresponding to a TCR β chain constant domain        extracellular sequence, and    -   a second polypeptide wherein a sequence corresponding to a TCR β        or γ chain variable domain sequence fused to the N terminus a        sequence corresponding to a TCR β chain constant domain        extracellular sequence,        the first and second polypeptides being linked by a disulfide        bond which has no equivalent in native αβ or γδ T cell        receptors.

Preferably, the dTCR is displayed on a filamentous phage particle and isone which is constituted by

-   -   a first polypeptide wherein a sequence corresponding to a TCR α        chain variable domain sequence is fused to the N terminus of a        sequence corresponding to a TCR α chain constant domain        extracellular sequence, and    -   a second polypeptide wherein a sequence corresponding to a TCR β        chain variable domain sequence is fused to the N terminus a        sequence corresponding to a TCR β chain constant domain        extracellular sequence,        the first and second polypeptides being linked by a disulfide        bond between cysteine residues substituted for Thr 48 of exon 1        of TRAC*01 and Ser 57 of exon 1 of TRBC1*01 or TRBC2*01 or the        non-human equivalent thereof,

-   the C-terminus of one member of the dTCR polypeptide pair being    linked by a peptide bond to a coat protein of the phage.

-   dTCR Polypeptide Pair and scTCR Polypeptide

The constant domain extracellular sequences present in the scTCRs ordTCRs preferably correspond to those of a human TCR, as do the variabledomain sequences. However, the correspondence between such sequencesneed not be 1:1 on an amino acid level. N- or C-truncation, and/or aminoacid deletion and/or substitution relative to the corresponding humanTCR sequences is acceptable. In particular, because the constant domainextracellular sequences present in the first and second segments are notdirectly involved in contacts with the ligand to which the scTCR or dTCRbinds, they may be shorter than, or may contain substitutions ordeletions relative to, extracellular constant domain sequences of nativeTCRs.

The constant domain extracellular sequence present in one of the dTCRpolypeptide pair, or in the first segment of a scTCR polypeptide mayinclude a sequence corresponding to the extracellular constant Ig domainof a TCR α chain, and/or the constant domain extracellular sequencepresent in the other member of the pair or second segment may include asequence corresponding to the extracellular constant Ig domain of a TCRβ chain.

In one embodiment of the invention, one member of the dTCR polypeptidepair, or the first segment of the scTCR polypeptide, corresponds tosubstantially all the variable domain of a TCR α chain fused to the Nterminus of substantially all the extracellular domain of the constantdomain of an TCR α chain; and/or the other member of the pair or secondsegment corresponds to substantially all the variable domain of a TCR βchain fused to the N terminus of substantially all the extracellulardomain of the constant domain of a TCR β chain.

In another embodiment, the constant domain extracellular sequencespresent in the dTCR polypeptide pair, or first and second segments ofthe scTCR polypeptide, correspond to the constant domains of the α and βchains of a native TCR truncated at their C termini such that thecysteine residues which form the native inter-chain disulfide bond ofthe TCR are excluded. Alternatively those cysteine residues may besubstituted by another amino acid residue such as serine or alanine, sothat the native disulfide bond is deleted. In addition, the native TCR βchain contains an unpaired cysteine residue and that residue may bedeleted from, or replaced by a non-cysteine residue in, the β sequenceof the scTCR of the invention.

In one particular embodiment of the invention, the TCR α and β chainvariable domain sequences present in the dTCR polypeptide pair, or firstand second segments of the scTCR polypeptide, may together correspond tothe functional variable domain of a first TCR, and the TCR α and β chainconstant domain extracellular sequences present in the dTCR polypeptidepair or first and second segments of the scTCR polypeptide maycorrespond to those of a second TCR, the first and second TCRs beingfrom the same species. Thus, the α and β chain variable domain sequencespresent in dTCR polypeptide pair, or first and second segments of thescTCR polypeptide, may correspond to those of a first human TCR, and theα and β constant domain extracellular sequences may correspond to thoseof a second human TCR. For example, A6 Tax sTCR constant domainextracellular sequences can be used as a framework onto whichheterologous α and β variable domains can be fused.

In another embodiment of the invention, the TCR δ and γ chain variabledomain sequences present in the dTCR polypeptide pair or first andsecond segments of the scTCR polypeptide respectively, may togethercorrespond to the functional variable domain of a first TCR, and the TCRα and β chain constant domain extracellular sequences present in thedTCR polypeptide pair or first and second segments of the scTCRpolypeptide respectively, may correspond to those of a second TCR, thefirst and second TCRs being from the same species. Thus the δ and γchain variable domain sequences present in the dTCR polypeptide pair orfirst and second segments of the scTCR polypeptide may correspond tothose of a first human TCR, and the α and β chain constant domainextracellular sequences may correspond to those of a second human TCR.For example, A6 Tax sTCR constant domain extracellular sequences can beused as a framework onto which heterologous γ and δ variable domains canbe fused.

In one particular embodiment of the invention, the TCR α and β, or δ andγ chain variable domain sequences present in the dTCR polypeptide pairor first and second segments of the scTCR polypeptide may togethercorrespond to the functional variable domain of a first human TCR, andthe TCR α and β chain constant domain extracellular sequences present inthe dTCR polypeptide pair or first and second segments of the scTCRpolypeptide may correspond to those of a second non-human TCR, Thus theα and β, or δ and γ chain variable domain sequences present dTCRpolypeptide pair or first and second segments of the scTCR polypeptidemay correspond to those of a first human TCR, and the α and β chainconstant domain extracellular sequences may correspond to those of asecond non-human TCR. For example, murine TCR constant domainextracellular sequences can be used as a framework onto whichheterologous human α and β TCR variable domains can be fused.

Linker in the scTCR Polypeptide

For scTCR-displaying proteinaceous particles of the present invention, alinker sequence links the first and second TCR segments, to form asingle polypeptide strand.

The linker sequence may, for example, have the formula -P-AA-P- whereinP is proline and AA represents an amino acid sequence wherein the aminoacids are glycine and serine.

For the scTCR displayed by proteinaceous particles of the presentinvention to bind to a ligand, MHC-peptide complex in the case of αβTCRs, the first and second segments are paired so that the variabledomain sequences thereof are orientated for such binding. Hence thelinker should have sufficient length to span the distance between the Cterminus of the first segment and the N terminus of the second segment,or vice versa. On the other hand excessive linker length shouldpreferably be avoided, in case the end of the linker at the N-terminalvariable domain sequence blocks or reduces bonding of the scTCR to thetarget ligand.

For example, in the case where the constant domain extracellularsequences present in the first and second segments correspond to theconstant domains of the α and β chains of a native TCR truncated attheir C termini such that the cysteine residues which form the nativeinterchain disulfide bond of the TCR are excluded, and the linkersequence links the C terminus of the first segment to the N terminus ofthe second segment.

The linker sequence may consist of, for example, from 26 to 41 aminoacids, preferably 29, 30, 31 or 32 amino acids, or 33, 34, 35 or 36amino acids. Particular linkers have the formula -PGGG-(SGGGG)₅-P- (SEQID NO: 181) and-PGGG-(SGGGG)₆-P- (SEQ ID NO: 182) wherein P is proline,G is glycine and S is serine.

Inter-Chain Disulfide Bond

A principle characterising feature of the preferred dTCRs and scTCRsdisplayed by proteinaceous particles of the present invention, is adisulfide bond between the constant domain extracellular sequences ofthe dTCR polypeptide pair or first and second segments of the scTCRpolypeptide. That bond may correspond to the native inter-chaindisulfide bond present in native dimeric αβ TCRs, or may have nocounterpart in native TCRs, being between cysteines specificallyincorporated into the constant domain extracellular sequences of dTCRpolypeptide pair or first and second segments of the scTCR polypeptide.In some cases, both a native and a non-native disulfide bond may bedesirable.

The position of the disulfide bond is subject to the requirement thatthe variable domain sequences of dTCR polypeptide pair or first andsecond segments of the scTCR polypeptide are mutually orientatedsubstantially as in native αβ or γδ T cell receptors.

The disulfide bond may be formed by mutating non-cysteine residues onthe first and second segments to cysteine, and causing the bond to beformed between the mutated residues. Residues whose respective β carbonsare approximately 6 Å (0.6 nm) or less, and preferably in the range 3.5Å (0.35 nm) to 5.9 Å (0.59 nm) apart in the native TCR are preferred,such that a disulfide bond can be formed between cysteine residuesintroduced in place of the native residues. It is preferred if thedisulfide bond is between residues in the constant immunoglobulindomain, although it could be between residues of the membrane proximaldomain. Preferred sites where cysteines can be introduced to form thedisulfide bond are the following residues in exon 1 of TRAC*01 for theTCR α chain and TRBC1*01 or TRBC2*01 for the TCR β chain:

Native β carbon TCR α chain TCR β chain separation (nm) Thr 48 Ser 570.473 Thr 45 Ser 77 0.533 Tyr 10 Ser 17 0.359 Thr 45 Asp 59 0.560 Ser 15Glu 15 0.59

The following motifs in the respective human TCR chains may be used toidentify the residue to be mutated (the shaded residue is the residuefor mutation to a cysteine).

α Chain Thr 48:

α Chain Thr 45:

α Chain Tyr 10:

α Chain Ser 15:

β Chain Ser 57:

β Chain Ser 77:

β Chain Ser 17:

β Chain Asp 59:

β Chain Glu 15:

In other species, the TCR chains may not have a region which has 100%identity to the above motifs. However, those of skill in the art will beable to use the above motifs to identify the equivalent part of the TCRα or β chain and hence the residue to be mutated to cysteine. Alignmenttechniques may be used in this respect. For example, ClustalW, availableon the European Bioinformatics Institute website(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/index.html) can be used to compare the motifsabove to a particular TCR chain sequence in order to locate the relevantpart of the TCR sequence for mutation.

The present invention includes within its scope proteinaceousparticle-displayed αβ and γδ-analogue scTCRs, as well as those of othermammals, including, but not limited to, mouse, rat, pig, goat and sheep.As mentioned above, those of skill in the art will be able to determinesites equivalent to the above-described human sites at which cysteineresidues can be introduced to form an inter-chain disulfide bond. Forexample, the following shows the amino acid sequences of the mouse Cαand Cβ soluble domains, together with motifs showing the murine residuesequivalent to the human residues mentioned above that can be mutated tocysteines to form a TCR interchain disulfide bond (where the relevantresidues are shaded):

Mouse Cα soluble domain: (SEQ ID 10)PYIQNPEPAVYQLKDPRSQDSTLCLFTDFDSQINVPKTMESGTFITDKTVLDMKAMDSKSNGAIAWSNQTSFTCQDIFKETNATYPSSDVP Mouse Cβ soluble domain:(SEQ ID 11) EDLRNVTPPKVSLFEPSKAEIANKQKATLVCLARGFFPDHVELSWWVNGREVHSGVSTDPQAYKESNYSYCLSSRLRVSATFWHNPRNHFRCQVQFHGLSEEDKWPEGSPKPVTQNISAIAWGRAD (SEQ ID 12)

(SEQ ID 13)

(SEQ ID 14)

(SEQ ID 15)

(SEQ ID 16)

(SEQ ID 17)

(SEQ ID 18)

(SEQ ID 19)

(SEQ ID 20)

As discussed above, the A6 Tax sTCR extracellular constant domains canbe used as framework onto which heterologous variable domains can befused. It is preferred that the heterologous variable domain sequencesare linked to the constant domain sequences at any point between thedisulfide bond and the N termini of the constant domain sequences. Inthe case of the A6 Tax TCR α and β constant domain sequences, thedisulfide bond may be formed between cysteine residues introduced atamino acid residues 158 and 172 respectively. Therefore it is preferredif the heterologous α and β chain variable domain sequence attachmentpoints are between residues 159 or 173 and the N terminus of the α or βconstant domain sequences respectively.

TCR Display

The preferred in-vivo TCR display method for biopanning to identify TCRshaving desirable properties such as high affinity for a targetpeptide-MHC complex is phage display.

Firstly, a DNA library is constructed that encodes a diverse array ofmutated scTCRs or dTCRs. This library is constructed by using DNAencoding a native TCR as the template for amplification. There are anumber of suitable methods, known to those skilled in the art, for theintroduction of the desired mutations into the TCR DNA, and hence thefinally expressed TCR protein. For example error-prone PCR (EP-TCR), DNAshuffling techniques, and the use of bacterial mutator strains such asXL-1-Red are convenient means of introducing mutations into the TCRsequences. It is particularly preferred if these mutations areintroduced into defined domain of the TCRs. For example, mutations inthe variable domain, particularly the complementarity-determiningregions (CDRs) and/or framework regions are likely to be the mostappropriate sites for the introduction of mutations leading to theproduction of a diverse library of TCRs for the production of TCRs withenhanced ligand-binding properties. EP-PCR is an example of a method bywhich such ‘region-specific’ mutations can be introduced into the TCRs.EP-PCR primers are used that are complementary to DNA sequencesbordering the region to be mutated to amplify multiple copies of thisregion of the TCR DNA that contain a controllable level of randommutations. These DNA sequences encoding mutated regions are insertedinto the DNA sequences, which encode the non-mutagenised sections of theTCR, by ligation or overlapping PCR. The DNA encoding the TCR withmutated region can then be ligated onto DNA encoding a heterologouspolypeptide in order to produce a fusion protein suitable for display.In the case of phage-display the expression vector utilised is either aphagemid or a phage gemone vector in which the TCR DNA can be ligated toDNA encoding a surface protein, preferably the gIII or gVIII surfaceprotein. In the case of a scTCR such ligation is performed as for phagedisplay of any monomeric peptide or polypeptide. In the case of dTCRs,only one of the TCR chains is ligated as aforesaid. The other chain isencoded in nucleic acid for co-expression with phagemid and helper phagenucleic acid, so that the expressed second chain finds and associateswith the expressed phage with surface displayed first chain. In bothcases, as discussed in more detail above, properly positioned cysteinesin the constant domains are helpful in causing the variable domains ofthe TCR to adopt their functional positions, through the formation of adisulfide bond by those cysteines.

For expression, an expression vector comprising (a) nucleic acidencoding one chain of a dTCR polypeptide pair, and (b) the other chainof a dTCR polypeptide pair fused to a nucleic acid sequence encoding aparticle forming protein, or a cell surface protein; or nucleic acidencoding a scTCR polypeptide fused to a nucleic acid sequence encoding aparticle forming protein or a cell surface protein, the dTCR pair, or acomposition comprising a first vector comprising nucleic acid (a) and asecond vector comprising nucleic acid (b), are contacted with host cellscapable of causing the expression of the encoded genetic material underconditions suitable to allow the transformation of said cells. Suchexpression vectors, expression systems comprising phagemid or phagegenome vectors encoding dTCRs and scTCRs, and host cells harbouring themform additional aspects of the current invention. In a preferredembodiment of the invention the phagemid or phage genome vectors arederived from filamentous phage.

The transformed cells are then incubated to allow the expression of theTCR-displaying proteinaceous particles. These particles can then be usedfor screening or in assays to identify TCR variants with specificenhanced characteristics. Any particles that possess the enhancedcharacteristics under investigation can then be isolated. The DNAencoding these TCRs can then be amplified by PCR and the sequencedetermined.

It is known that high expression levels of an exogenous polypeptide maybe toxic to the host cell. In such cases, either a host strain which ismore tolerant of the exogenous polypeptide must be found, or theexpression levels in the host cell must be limited to a level which istolerated. For example (Beekwilder et al., (1999) Gene 228 (1-2) 23-31)report that only mutated forms of a potato protease inhibitor (PI2)which contained deletions or amber stop codons would be successfullyselected from a phage display library. In the present case, anobservation in the course of the work reported in the Examples hereinsuggests that it may be desirable to limit the expression levels ofprotein particle-displayed TCRs of the invention, at least in somestrains of E. coli. Thus, the A6 TCR selected in Example 4 afterrepeated rounds of culture was shown to be derived from cells in whichthe phagemid had mutated relative to that introduced at the start. Themutation had created an ‘opal’ stop codon in the TCR β chain. This codonis ‘read-through’ with low frequency by ribosomes of the E. coli strainutilised resulting in the insertion of a tryptophan residue at this siteand a much reduced overall level of full-length β chain expression.

There are several strategies for limiting the expression levels of anexogenous polypeptide from a given expression system in a host which maybe suitable for the limiting the expression levels of a scTCR, or one,or both TCR chains of a dTCR. For example:

Use of a weak promoter sequence—The level of expression obtained for agiven gene product, such as the TCR α or β chain, can be tailored byusing promoter sequences of varying strengths. The lambda phage P_(RM)promoter is an example of a weak promoter.

Mutated ribosome binding sites (RBS's)—Mutating a single nucleic acid inthe RBS associated with a gene product, such as the TCR α or β chain,can result in a reduced level of expression. For example, mutating awild-type AGGA sequence to AGGG.

Mutated ‘start codons’—Mutating a single nucleic acid in the start codonassociated with a gene product, such as the TCR α or β chain, can alsoresult in a reduced level of expression. For example, mutating awild-type AUG start codon to GUG.

Miss-sense suppressor mutations—These are inserted within the TCR βchain coding regions. Examples include the ‘opal’ stop codon (UGA), this‘leaky’ stop codon results in the low frequency insertion of atryptophan amino acid and read-through of the rest of the codingsequence.

Metabolite-mediated modification of promoter strength—The level ofexpression of a gene product, such as the TCR α or β chain, under thecontrol of certain promoters can be down-regulated by the addition of arelevant metabolite to the cells containing the promoter. For example,glucose additions can be used to down-regulate expression of a geneproduct under the control of a Lac promoter.

Codon usage—Bacterial cells and, for example, mammalian cells havedifferent ‘preferences’ relating to the codons they use to encodecertain amino acids. For example, bacterial cells most commonly use theCGU codon to encode arginine whereas eucaryotic cells most commonly useAGA. It is possible to reduce the level of expression of a gene product,such as the TCR α or β chain, by utilising DNA sequences that contain anumber of codons less preferred by the expression system being utilised.

Details relating to the above means of down-regulating gene productexpression can be found in (Glass (1982) Gene Function-E. coli and itsheritable elements, Croom Helm) and (Rezinoff (1980) The Operon 2ndEdition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

It is also known that supplying bacterial cultures with a relativelyhigh concentration of a sugar such as sucrose can increase periplasmicexpression levels of soluble proteins. (See for example (Sawyer et al.,(1994) Protein Engineering 7 (11) 1401-1406))

After expression, correct pairing of the scTCR polypeptide variabledomain sequences is preferably assisted by the introduction of adisulfide bond in the extracellular constant domain of the scTCR.Without wanting to be limited by theory, the novel disulfide bond isbelieved to provide extra stability to the scTCR during the foldingprocess and thereby facilitating correct pairing of the first and secondsegments.

Also as mentioned above, for dTCR phage display, one of the dTCRpolypeptide pair is expressed as if it were eventually to be displayedas a monomeric polypeptide on the phage, and the other of the dTCRpolypeptide pair is co-expressed in the same host cell. As the phageparticle self assembles, the two polypeptides self associate for displayas a dimer on the phage. Again, in the preferred embodiment of thisaspect of the invention, correct folding during association of thepolypeptide pair is assisted by a disulfide bond between the constantsequences, as discussed above. Further details of a procedure for phagedisplay of a dTCR having an interchain disulfide bond appear in theExamples herein.

As an alternative, the phage displaying the first chain of the dTCR maybe expressed first, and the second chain polypeptide may be contactedwith the expressed phage in a subsequent step, for association as afunctional dTCR on the phage surface.

The preferred in-vitro TCR display method for biopanning to identifyTCRs having desirable properties such as high affinity for a targetpeptide-MHC complex is ribosomal display. Firstly, a DNA library isconstructed that encodes a diverse array of mutated scTCRs or dTCRpolypeptides using the techniques discussed above. The DNA library isthen contacted with RNA polymerase in order to produce a complementarymRNA library. Optionally, for mRNA display techniques the mRNA sequencescan then be ligated to a DNA sequence comprising a puromycin bindingsite. These genetic constructs are then contacted with ribosomesin-vitro under conditions allowing the translation of the scTCRpolypeptide or the first polypeptide of the dTCR pair. In the case ofthe dTCR, the second of the polypeptide pairs is separately expressedand contacted with the ribosome-displayed first polypeptide, forassociation between the two, preferably assisted by the formation of thedisulphide bond between constant domains. Alternatively, mRNA encodingboth chains of the TCR may be contacted with ribosomes in-vitro underconditions allowing the translation of the TCR chains such that aribosome displaying a dTCR is formed.

These scTCR- or dTCR-displaying ribosomes can then used for screening orin assays to identify TCR variants with specific enhancedcharacteristics. Any particles that possess the enhanced characteristicsunder investigation can then be isolated. The mRNA encoding these TCRscan then converted to the complementary DNA sequences using reversetranscriptase. This DNA can then be amplified by PCR and the sequencedetermined.

Additional Aspects

A proteinaceous particle displaying a scTCR or dTCR (which preferably isconstituted by constant and variable sequences corresponding to humansequences) of the present invention may be provided in substantiallypure form, or as a purified or isolated preparation. For example, it maybe provided in a form which is substantially free of other proteins.

A phage particle displaying a plurality of scTCRs or dTCRs of thepresent invention may be provided in a multivalent complex. Thus, thepresent invention provides, in one aspect, a multivalent T cell receptor(TCR) complex, which comprises a phage particle displaying a pluralityof scTCRs or dTCRs as described herein. Each of the plurality of saidscTCRs or dTCRs is preferably identical.

In a further aspect, the invention provides a method for detecting TCRligand complexes, which comprises:

-   -   a. providing a TCR-displaying proteineaceous particle of the        current invention    -   b. contacting the TCR-displaying phage with the putative ligand        complexes; and detecting binding of the TCR-displaying        proteinaceous particle to the putative ligand complexes.

TCR ligands suitable for identification by the above method include, butare not limited to, peptide-MHC complexes.

Isolation of TCR Variants with Enhanced Characteristics

A further aspect of the invention is a method for the identification ofTCRs with a specific characteristic, said method comprising subjecting adiverse library of TCRs displayed on proteinaceous particles to aselection process which selects for said characteristic, and isolatingproteinaceous particles which display a TCR having said characteristic,and optionally to an amplification process to multiply the isolatedparticles, and/or a screening process which measures saidcharacteristic, identifying those proteinaceous particles which displaya TCR with the desired characteristic and isolating these proteinaceousparticles, and optionally to an amplification process to multiply theisolated particles.

The DNA sequences encoding the variant TCRs can then be obtained andamplified by PCR to allow the sequences to be determined. Thecharacteristics that can be enhanced include, but are not limited to,ligand binding affinity and construct stability.

Screening Use

The TCR-displaying proteinaceous particles of the present invention arecapable of utilisation in screening methods designed to identifymodulators, including inhibitors, of the TCR-mediated cellular immunesynapse.

As is know to those skilled in the art there are a number of assayformats that provide a suitable basis for protein-protein interactionscreens of this type.

Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogeneous Assay systems such as theAlphaScreen™, rely on the use of “Donor” and “Acceptor” beads that arecoated with a layer of hydrogel to which receptor and ligand proteinscan be attached. The interaction between these receptor and ligandmolecules brings the beads into proximity. When these beads are subjectto laser light a photosensitizer in the “Donor” bead converts ambientoxygen to a more excited singlet state. The singlet state oxygenmolecules diffuse across to react with a chemiluminescer in the“Acceptor” bead that further activates fluorophores contained within thesame bead. The fluorophores subsequently emit light at 520-620 nm, thissignals that the receptor-ligand interaction has occurred. The presenceof an inhibitor of the receptor-ligand interaction causes this signal tobe diminished.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) is an interfacial optical assay, inwhich one binding partner (normally the receptor) is immobilised on a‘chip’ (the sensor surface) and the binding of the other binding partner(normally the ligand), which is soluble and is caused to flow over thechip, is detected. The binding of the ligand results in an increase inconcentration of protein near to the chip surface which causes a changein the refractive index in that region. The surface of the chip iscomprised such that the change in refractive index may be detected bysurface plasmon resonance, an optical phenomenon whereby light at acertain angle of incidence on a thin metal film produces a reflectedbeam of reduced intensity due to the resonant excitation of waves ofoscillating surface charge density (surface plasmons). The resonance isvery sensitive to changes in the refractive index on the far side of themetal film, and it is this signal which is used to detect bindingbetween the immobilised and soluble proteins. Systems which allowconvenient use of SPR detection of molecular interactions, and dataanalysis, are commercially available. Examples are the Iasys™ machines(Fisons) and the Biacore™ machines.

Other interfacial optical assays include total internal reflectancefluorescence (TIRF), resonant mirror (RM) and optical grating couplersensor (GCS), and are discussed in more detail in Woodbury and Venton(J. Chromatog. B. 725 113-137 (1999)).

The scintillation proximity assay (SPA) has been used to screen compoundlibraries for inhibitors of the low affinity interaction between CD28and B7 (K_(d) probably in the region of 4 μM (Van der Merwe et at J.Exp. Med. 185:393-403 (1997), Jenh et al, Anal Biochem 165(2) 287-93(1998)). SPA is a radioactive assay making use of beta particle emissionfrom certain radioactive isotopes which transfers energy to ascintillant immobilised on the indicator surface. The short range of thebeta particles in solution ensures that scintillation only occurs whenthe beta particles are emitted in close proximity to the scintillant.When applied for the detection of protein-protein interactions, oneinteraction partner is labelled with the radioisotope, while the otheris either bound to beads containing scintillant or coated on a surfacetogether with scintillant. If the assay can be set up optimally, theradioisotope will be brought close enough to the scintillant for photonemission to be activated only when binding between the two proteinsoccurs.

A further aspect of the invention is a method of identifying aninhibitor of the interaction between a TCR-displaying proteinaceousparticle of the invention, and a TCR-binding ligand comprisingcontacting the TCR-displaying proteinaceous particle with a TCR-bindingligand, in the presence of and in the absence of a test compound, anddetermining whether the presence of the test compound reduces binding ofthe TCR-displaying proteinaceous particle to the TCR-binding ligand,such reduction being taken as identifying an inhibitor.

A further aspect of the invention is a method of identifying a potentialinhibitor of the interaction between an TCR-displaying proteinaceousparticle of the invention, and a TCR-binding ligand, for example aMHC-peptide complex, comprising contacting the TCR-displayingproteinaceous particle or TCR-binding ligand partner with a testcompound and determining whether the test compound binds to theTCR-displaying proteinaceous particle and/or the TCR-binding ligand,such binding being taken as identifying a potential inhibitor. Thisaspect of the invention may find particular utility in interfacialoptical assays such as those carried out using the Biacore™ system.

High Affinity TCRs

The present invention also makes available mutated TCRs specific for agiven TCR ligand with higher affinity for said TCR ligand than thewild-type TCR. These high affinity TCRs are expected to be particularlyuseful for the diagnosis and treatment of disease.

As used herein the term ‘high affinity TCR’ refers to a mutated scTCR ordTCR which interacts with a specific TCR ligand and either: has a Kd forthe said TCR ligand less than that of a corresponding native TCR asmeasured by Surface Plasmon Resonance, or has an off-rate (k_(off)) forthe said TCR ligand less than that of a corresponding native TCR asmeasured by Surface Plasmon Resonance.

High affinity scTCRs or dTCRs of the present invention are preferablymutated relative to the native TCR in at least one complementaritydetermining region and/or framework regions.

In one aspect of the present invention the TCR ligand for which a givenhigh affinity TCR is specific is a peptide-MHC complex (pMHC).

In another aspect of the present invention the TCR ligand for which agiven high affinity TCR is specific is an MHC type or types.

In a further aspect of the present invention the TCR ligand for which agiven high affinity TCR is specific is the HLA-A2 tax peptide(LLFGYPVYV) (SEQ ID 21) complex.

In a further aspect of the present invention the TCR ligand for which agiven high affinity TCR is specific is the HLA-A2 NY-ESO peptide(SLLMITQC) (SEQ ID 22) complex.

A high affinity scTCR or one or both of the high affinity dTCR chainsmay be labelled with an imaging compound, for example a label that issuitable for diagnostic purposes. Such labelled high affinity TCRs areuseful in a method for detecting a TCR ligand selected from CD1-antigencomplexes, bacterial superantigens, and MHC-peptide/superantigencomplexes which method comprises contacting the TCR ligand with a highaffinity TCR (or a multimeric high affinity TCR complex) which isspecific for the TCR ligand; and detecting binding to the TCR ligand. Intetrameric high affinity TCR complexes (formed, for example) usingbiotinylated heterodimers) fluorescent streptavidin (commerciallyavailable) can be used to provide a detectable label. Afluorescently-labelled tetramer is suitable for use in FACS analysis,for example to detect antigen presenting cells carrying the peptide forwhich the high affinity TCR is specific.

Another manner in which the soluble high affinity TCRs of the presentinvention may be detected is by the use of TCR-specific antibodies, inparticular monoclonal antibodies. There are many commercially availableanti-TCR antibodies, such as αF1 and βF1, which recognise the constantdomains of the α and β chains, respectively.

A high affinity TCR (or multivalent complex thereof) of the presentinvention may alternatively or additionally be associated with (e.g.covalently or otherwise linked to) a therapeutic agent which may be, forexample, a toxic moiety for use in cell killing, or an immunostimulatingagent such as an interleukin or a cytokine A multivalent high affinityTCR complex of the present invention may have enhanced bindingcapability for a TCR ligand compared to a non-multimeric wild-type orhigh affinity T cell receptor heterodimer. Thus, the multivalent highaffinity TCR complexes according to the invention are particularlyuseful for tracking or targeting cells presenting particular antigens invitro or in vivo, and are also useful as intermediates for theproduction of further multivalent high affinity TCR complexes havingsuch uses. The high affinity TCR or multivalent high affinity TCRcomplex may therefore be provided in a pharmaceutically acceptableformulation for use in vivo.

The invention also provides a method for delivering a therapeutic agentto a target cell, which method comprises contacting potential targetcells with a high affinity TCR or multivalent high affinity TCR complexin accordance with the invention under conditions to allow attachment ofthe high affinity TCR or multivalent high affinity TCR complex to thetarget cell, said high affinity TCR or multivalent high affinity TCRcomplex being specific for the TCR ligand and having the therapeuticagent associated therewith.

In particular, the soluble high affinity TCR or multivalent highaffinity TCR complex can be used to deliver therapeutic agents to thelocation of cells presenting a particular antigen. This would be usefulin many situations and, in particular, against tumours. A therapeuticagent could be delivered such that it would exercise its effect locallybut not only on the cell it binds to. Thus, one particular strategyenvisages anti-tumour molecules linked to high affinity T cell receptorsor multivalent high affinity TCR complexes specific for tumour antigens.

Many therapeutic agents could be employed for this use, for instanceradioactive compounds, enzymes (perforin for example) orchemotherapeutic agents (cis-platin for example). To ensure that toxiceffects are exercised in the desired location the toxin could be insidea liposome linked to streptavidin so that the compound is releasedslowly. This will prevent damaging effects during the transport in thebody and ensure that the toxin has maximum effect after binding of theTCR to the relevant antigen presenting cells.

Other suitable therapeutic agents include:

-   -   small molecule cytotoxic agents, i.e. compounds with the ability        to kill mammalian cells having a molecular weight of less than        700 daltons. Such compounds could also contain toxic metals        capable of having a cytotoxic effect. Furthermore, it is to be        understood that these small molecule cytotoxic agents also        include pro-drugs, i.e. compounds that decay or are converted        under physiological conditions to release cytotoxic agents.        Examples of such agents include cis-platin, maytansine        derivatives, rachelmycin, calicheamicin, docetaxel, etoposide,        gemcitabine, ifosfamide, irinotecan, melphalan, mitoxantrone,        sorfimer sodiumphotofrin II, temozolmide, topotecan, trimetreate        glucuronate, auristatin E vincristine and doxorubicin;    -   peptide cytotoxins, i.e. proteins or fragments thereof with the        ability to kill mammalian cells. Examples include ricin,        diphtheria toxin, pseudomonas bacterial exotoxin A, DNAase and        RNAase;    -   radio-nuclides, i.e. unstable isotopes of elements which decay        with the concurrent emission of one or more of α or β particles,        or γ rays. Examples include iodine 131, rhenium 186, indium 111,        yttrium 90, bismuth 210 and 213, actinium 225 and astatine 213;        chelating agents may be used to facilitate the association of        these radio-nuclides to the high affinity TCRs, or multimers        thereof;    -   prodrugs, such as antibody directed enzyme pro-drugs;    -   immuno-stimulants, i.e. moieties which stimulate immune        response. Examples include cytokines such as IL-2, chemokines        such as IL-8, platelet factor 4, melanoma growth stimulatory        protein, etc, antibodies or fragments thereof, complement        activators, xenogeneic protein domains, allogeneic protein        domains, viral/bacterial protein domains and viral/bacterial        peptides.

Soluble high affinity TCRs or multivalent high affinity TCR complexes ofthe invention may be linked to an enzyme capable of converting a prodrugto a drug. This allows the prodrug to be converted to the drug only atthe site where it is required (i.e. targeted by the sTCR).

A multitude of disease treatments can potentially be enhanced bylocalising the drug through the specificity of soluble high affinityTCRs. For example, it is expected that the high affinity HLA-A2-tax(LLFGYPVYV) (SEQ ID 21) specific A6 TCRs disclosed herein may be used inmethods for the diagnosis and treatment of HTLV-1 and that the highaffinity HLA-A2-NY-ESO (SLLMITQC) (SEQ ID 22) specific NY-ESO TCRdisclosed herein may be used in methods for the diagnosis and treatmentof cancer.

Viral diseases for which drugs exist, e.g. HIV, SIV, EBV, CMV, wouldbenefit from the drug being released or activated in the near vicinityof infected cells. For cancer, the localisation in the vicinity oftumours or metastasis would enhance the effect of toxins orimmunostimulants. In autoimmune diseases, immunosuppressive drugs couldbe released slowly, having more local effect over a longer time-spanwhile minimally affecting the overall immune-capacity of the subject. Inthe prevention of graft rejection, the effect of immunosuppressive drugscould be optimised in the same way. For vaccine delivery, the vaccineantigen could be localised in the vicinity of antigen presenting cells,thus enhancing the efficacy of the antigen. The method can also beapplied for imaging purposes.

The soluble high affinity TCRs of the present invention may be used tomodulate T cell activation by binding to specific TCR ligand and therebyinhibiting T cell activation. Autoimmune diseases involving Tcell-mediated inflammation and/or tissue damage would be amenable tothis approach, for example type I diabetes. Knowledge of the specificpeptide epitope presented by the relevant pMHC is required for this use.

Therapeutic or imaging high affinity TCRs in accordance with theinvention will usually be supplied as part of a sterile, pharmaceuticalcomposition which will normally include a pharmaceutically acceptablecarrier. This pharmaceutical composition may be in any suitable form,(depending upon the desired method of administering it to a patient). Itmay be provided in unit dosage form, will generally be provided in asealed container and may be provided as part of a kit. Such a kit wouldnormally (although not necessarily) include instructions for use. It mayinclude a plurality of said unit dosage forms.

The pharmaceutical composition may be adapted for administration by anyappropriate route, for example parenteral, transdermal or viainhalation, preferably a parenteral (including subcutaneous,intramuscular, or, most preferably intravenous) route. Such compositionsmay be prepared by any method known in the art of pharmacy, for exampleby admixing the active ingredient with the carrier(s) or excipient(s)under sterile conditions.

Dosages of the substances of the present invention can vary between widelimits, depending upon the disease or disorder to be treated, the ageand condition of the individual to be treated, etc. and a physician willultimately determine appropriate dosages to be used.

The invention also provides a method for obtaining a high affinity TCRchain, which method comprises incubating such a host cell underconditions causing expression of the high affinity TCR chain and thenpurifying the polypeptide.

Preferred features of each aspect of the invention are as for each ofthe other aspects mutatis mutandis. The prior art documents mentionedherein are incorporated to the fullest extent permitted by law.

EXAMPLES

The invention is further described in the following examples, which donot limit the scope of the invention in any way.

Reference is made in the following to the accompanying drawings inwhich:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A shows respectively the nucleic acid sequences of a soluble A6TCR α and β chains, mutated so as to introduce a cysteine codon. Theshading indicates the introduced cysteine codons.

FIG. 1B shows respectively the nucleic acid sequences of a soluble A6TCR α and β chains, mutated so as to introduce a cysteine codon. Theshading indicates the introduced cysteine codons.

FIG. 2A shows the A6 TCR α chain extracellular amino acid sequence,including the T₄₈→C mutation (underlined) used to produce the noveldisulphide inter-chain bond.

FIG. 2B shows the A6 TCR β chain extracellular amino acid sequence,including the S₃₇→C mutation (underlined) used to produce the noveldisulphide inter-chain bond.

FIG. 3 Outlines the cloning of TCR α and β chains into phagemid vectors.The diagram describes a phage display vector. RSB is theribosome-binding site. S1 or S2 are signal peptides for secretion ofproteins into periplasm of E. coli. The * indicates translation stopcodon. Either of the TCR α chain or β chain can be fused to phage coatprotein, however in this diagram only TCR β chain is fused to phage coatprotein.

FIGS. 4A-B details the DNA sequence of phagemid pEX746:A6.

FIG. 5 expression of phage particle fusions of bacterial coat proteinand heterodimeric A6 TCR in E. coli. Fusion proteins of heterodimeric A6TCR::gIII are detected using western blotting. Phage particles areprepared from E. coli XL-1-Blue and concentrated with PEG/NaCl. Thesamples are loaded in reducing or non-reducing sample buffers. Lane 1 isthe sample of clone 7 containing correct sequence, and lane 2 is thesample of clone 14 containing a deletion in the α-chain encoding gene.The heterodimeric A6 TCR:gIII fusion protein was detected at 125 kDa.

FIG. 6 illustrates ELISA detection of pMHC peptide complex bindingactivity of a heterodimeric A6 TCR displayed on phage. Clone 7 bindsspecifically to HLA A2-Tax complex. Clone 14 cannot bind to any pMHC, asno TCR is attached to the phage particles.

FIG. 7A is a schematic illustration of the single-chain A6 TCR-C-KappaDNA ribosome display construct.

FIG. 7B details the complete DNA coding strand and amino acid sequenceof the single-chain A6 TCR-C-Kappa DNA ribosome display constructencoded in pUC19 respectively.

FIG. 7C details the complete DNA coding strand and amino acid sequenceof the single-chain A6 TCR-C-Kappa DNA ribosome display constructencoded in pUC19 respectively.

FIG. 8 details the DNA sequence of pUC19-T7.

FIG. 9 details the DNA sequence of the single-chain A6 TCR-C-Kapparibosome display construct that was cloned into pUC19-T7.

FIG. 10 Western blot showing the detection of in-vitro translatedsingle-chain A6 TCR-C-Kappa using Ambion rabbit reticulocyte lysates.

FIG. 11 RT-PCR of the single-chain A6 TCR-C-Kappa mRNA on beads rescuedfrom the ribosome display reactions.

FIG. 12A details the DNA sequence of the A6 TCR Clone 9 mutated β chain;the mutated nucleic acid is indicated in bold.

FIG. 12B details the amino acid sequence of the A6 TCR Clone 9 mutated βchain, the position corresponding to the introduced opal stop codon isindicated with an *.

FIG. 13 details the DNA sequence of the A6 TCR Clone 49 mutated β chain;the mutated nucleic acid is indicated in bold. As this is a ‘silent’mutation no change is introduced into the resulting amino acid sequenceby this mutation.

FIG. 14A details the DNA sequence of the A6 TCR Clone 134 mutated A6 TCRβ chain; the mutated nucleic acids are indicated in bold.

FIG. 14B details the amino acid sequence of the A6 TCR Clone 134 mutatedA6 TCR β chain as tested by BIAcore assay; the mutated amino acids areindicated in bold.

FIG. 14C details the amino acid sequence of the A6 TCR Clone 134 mutatedA6 TCR β chain as tested by phage ELISA assay; the mutated amino acidsare indicated in bold.

FIG. 15 BIAcore data for the binding of A6 TCR clone 134 to HLA-A2 Taxand HLA-A2.

FIG. 16 BIAcore data used to determine T_(OFF) for the binding of A6 TCRclone 134 to HLA-A2 Tax

FIG. 17A shows the DNA sequence of the mutated α and β chains of theNY-ESO TCR respectively.

FIG. 17B shows the DNA sequence of the mutated α and β chains of theNY-ESO TCR respectively.

FIG. 18A shows the amino acid sequences of the mutated α and β chains ofthe NY-ESO TCR respectively.

FIG. 18B shows the amino acid sequences of the mutated α and β chains ofthe NY-ESO TCR respectively.

FIG. 19A details the DNA and amino acid sequence of the NY-ESO TCR βchain incorporated into the pEX746: NY-ESO phagemid respectively.

FIG. 19B details the DNA and amino acid sequence of the NY-ESO TCR βchain incorporated into the pEX746: NY-ESO phagemid respectively.

FIG. 20 shows the specific binding of phage particles displaying theNY-ESO TCR to HLA-A2-NY-ESO in a phage ELISA assay.

FIG. 21 shows the DNA sequence of the DR1α chain incorporating codonsencoding the Fos dimerisation peptide attached to the 3′ end of theDRA0101 sequence. Shading indicates the Fos codons and the biotinylationtag codons are indicated by in bold text.

FIG. 22A shows the DNA sequence of the pAcAB3 bi-cistronic vector usedfor the expression of Class II HLA-peptide complexes in Sf9 insectcells. The Bgl II restriction site (AGATCT) used to insert the HLA αchain and the Bam HI restriction site (GGATCC) used to insert the HLA βchain are indicated by shading.

FIG. 22B shows the DNA sequence of the pAcAB3 bi-cistronic vector usedfor the expression of Class II HLA-peptide complexes in Sf9 insectcells. The Bgl II restriction site (AGATCT) used to insert the HLA αchain and the Bam HI restriction site (GGATCC) used to insert the HLA βchain are indicated by shading.

FIG. 22C shows the DNA sequence of the pAcAB3 bi-cistronic vector usedfor the expression of Class II HLA-peptide complexes in Sf9 insectcells. The Bgl II restriction site (AGATCT) used to insert the HLA αchain and the Bam HI restriction site (GGATCC) used to insert the HLA βchain are indicated by shading.

FIG. 22D shows the DNA sequence of the pAcAB3 bi-cistronic vector usedfor the expression of Class II HLA-peptide complexes in Sf9 insectcells. The Bgl II restriction site (AGATCT) used to insert the HLA αchain and the Bam HI restriction site (GGATCC) used to insert the HLA βchain are indicated by shading.

FIG. 23 shows the DNA sequence of the DR1 β chain incorporating codonsencoding the Jun dimerisation peptide attached to the 3′ end of theDRB0401 sequence and codons encoding an HLA-loaded peptide attached tothe 5′ end of the DRB0401 sequence. Shading indicates the Jun codons,and the HLA-loaded Flu HA peptide codons are underlined.

FIG. 24 shows a BIAcore trace of the binding of the high affinity A6 TCRclone 134 to flowcells coated as follows:

Flow-cell 1 (FC 1)-Blank (SEQ ID 23)Flow-cell 2 (FC 2)-HLA-A2 (LLGRNSFEV) (SEQ ID 24)Flow-cell 3 (FC 3)-HLA-A2 (KLVALGINAV) (SEQ ID 25)Flow-cell 4 (FC 4)-HLA-A2 (LLGDLFGV)

FIG. 25 shows a BIAcore trace of the binding of the high affinity A6 TCRclone 134 to flowcells coated as follows:

Flow-cell 1 (FC 1)-Blank (SEQ ID 26)Flow-cell 2 (FC 2)-HLA-B8 (FLRGRAYGL) (SEQ ID 27)Flow-cell 3 (FC 3)-HLA-B27 (HRCQAIRKK) (SEQ ID 28)Flow-cell 4 (FC 4)-HLA-Cw6 (YRSGIIAVV)

FIG. 26 shows a BIAcore trace of the binding of the high affinity A6 TCRclone 134 to flowcells coated as follows:

Flow-cell 1 (FC 1)-Blank (SEQ ID 29)Flow-cell 2 (FC 2)-HLA-A24 (VYGFVRACL) (SEQ ID 30)Flow-cell 3 (FC 3)-HLA-A2 (ILAKFLHWL) (SEQ ID 31)Flow-cell 4 (FC 4)-HLA-A2 (LTLGEFLKL)

FIG. 27 shows a BIAcore trace of the binding of the high affinity A6 TCRclone 134 to flowcells coated as follows:

Flow-cell 1 (FC 1)-Blank (SEQ ID 32)Flow-cell 2 (FC 2)-HLA-DR1 (PKYVKQNTLKLA) (SEQ ID 33)Flow-cell 3 (FC 3)-HLA-A2 (GILGFVFTL) (SEQ ID 34)Flow-cell 4 (FC 4)-HLA-A2 (SLYNTVATL)

FIG. 28 shows a BIAcore trace of the binding of the high affinity A6 TCRclone 134 to flowcells coated as follows:

Flow-cell 1 (FC 1)- Blank (SEQ ID 21)Flow-cell 4 (FC 4)- HLA-A2 (LLFGYPVYV)

FIG. 29A shows Biacore plots of the interaction between the soluble highaffinity NY-ESO TCR and HLA-A2 NY-ESO.

FIG. 29B shows Biacore plots of the interaction between the soluble highaffinity NY-ESO TCR and HLA-A2 NY-ESO.

FIG. 30A shows Biacore plots of the interaction between the soluble“wild-type” NY-ESO TCR and HLA-A2 NY-ESO.

FIG. 30B shows Biacore plots of the interaction between the soluble“wild-type” NY-ESO TCR and HLA-A2 NY-ESO.

FIG. 31A shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (Clone 1) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 31B shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (Clone 1) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 32A shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (Clone 111) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 32B shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (Clone 111) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 33A shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (Clone 89) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 33B shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (Clone 89) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 34 shows a Biacore plot of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (containing Clone 71 and Clone 134 mutations) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 35 shows a Biacore plot of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (containing Clone 1 and βG102→A mutations) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 36A shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (containing Clone 89 and Clone 134 mutations) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 36B shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (containing Clone 89 and Clone 134 mutations) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 36C shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (containing Clone 89 and Clone 134 mutations) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 37A shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (containing Clone 71 and Clone 89 mutations) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 37B shows Biacore plots of the interaction between a mutant solubleA6 TCR (containing Clone 71 and Clone 89 mutations) and HLA-A2 Tax.

FIG. 38 details the β chain variable domain amino acid sequences of thefollowing A6 TCR clones:

FIG. 38A, Wild-type,

FIG. 38B, Clone 134,

FIG. 38C, Clone 89,

FIG. 38D, Clone 1 and Clone 111. The mutated residues are shown in bold,bracketed residues are alternative residues that may be present at aparticular site.

FIG. 38E, Clone 111. The mutated residues are shown in bold, bracketedresidues are alternative residues that may be present at a particularsite.

FIG. 39A illustrates specific staining of T2 cells by high affinity A6TCR tetramers.

FIG. 39B illustrates specific staining of T2 cells by high affinity A6TCR monomers.

As illustrated in FIG. 39A, specific staining of T2 cells by highaffinity A6 TCR tetramers could be observed at Tax peptideconcentrations of down to 10-9 M.

As illustrated in FIG. 39B, specific staining of T2 cells by highaffinity A6 TCR monomers could be observed at Tax peptide concentrationsof down to 10-8 M.

For mutating A6 Tax threonine 48 of exon 1 in TRAC*01 to cysteine, thefollowing primers were designed (mutation shown in lower case):

(SEQ ID 35) 5′-C ACA GAC AAA tgT GTG CTA GAC AT (SEQ ID 36)5′-AT GTC TAG CAC Aca TTT GTC TGT G

For mutating A6 Tax serine 57 of exon 1 in both TRBC1*01 and TRBC2*01 tocysteine, the following primers were designed (mutation shown in lowercase):

(SEQ ID 37) 5′-C AGT GGG GTC tGC ACA GAC CC (SEQ ID 38)5′-GG GTC TGT Gca GAC CCC ACT GPCR Mutagenesis:

Expression plasmids containing the genes for the A6 Tax TCR α or β chainwere mutated using the α-chain primers or the β-chain primersrespectively, as follows.

100 ng of plasmid was mixed with 5 μl 10 mM dNTP, 25 μl 10×Pfu-buffer(Stratagene), 10 units Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and the final volumewas adjusted to 240 μl with H₂O. 48 μl of this mix was supplemented withprimers diluted to give a final concentration of 0.2 μM in 50 μl finalreaction volume. After an initial denaturation step of 30 seconds at 95°C., the reaction mixture was subjected to 15 rounds of denaturation (95°C., 30 sec.), annealing (55° C., 60 sec.), and elongation (73° C., 8min.) in a Hybaid PCR express PCR machine. The product was then digestedfor 5 hours at 37° C. with 10 units of DpnI restriction enzyme (NewEngland Biolabs). 10 μl of the digested reaction was transformed intocompetent XL1-Blue bacteria and grown for 18 hours at 37° C. A singlecolony was picked and grown over night in 5 ml TYP+ampicillin (16 g/lBacto-Tryptone, 16 g/l Yeast Extract, 5 g/l NaCl, 2.5 g/l K₂HPO₄, 100mg/l Ampicillin). Plasmid DNA was purified on a Qiagen mini-prep columnaccording to the manufacturer's instructions and the sequence wasverified by automated sequencing at the sequencing facility ofDepartment of Biochemistry, Oxford University. The respective mutatednucleic acid and amino acid sequences are shown in FIGS. 1a and 2a forthe α chain and FIGS. 1b and 2b for the β chain.

EXAMPLE 2 Construction of Phage Display Vectors and Cloning of A6 TCR αand β Chains into the Phagemid Vectors

In order to display a heterodimeric A6 TCR containing a non-nativedisulfide inter-chain bond on filamentous phage particles, phagemidvectors were constructed for expression of fusion proteins comprisingthe heterodimeric A6 TCR containing a non-native disulfide inter-chainbond with a phage coat protein. These vectors contain a pUC19 origin, anM13 origin, a bla (Ampicillin resistant) gene, Lac promoter/operator anda CAP-binding site. The design of these vectors is outlined in FIG. 3,which describes vectors encoding for both the A6 TCR β chain-gp3 or A6TCR β chain-gp8 fusion proteins in addition to the soluble A6 TCR αchain β. The expression vectors containing the DNA sequences of themutated A6 TCR α and β chains incorporating the additional cysteineresidues required for the formation of a novel disulfide inter-chainbond prepared in Example 1 and as shown in FIGS. 1a and 1b were used asthe source of the A6 TCR α and β chains for the production of a phagemidencoding this TCR. The complete DNA sequence of the phagemid construct(pEX746) utilised is given in FIGS. 4A-B.

The molecular cloning methods for constructing the vectors are describedin “Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, by J. Sambrook and D. W.Russell”. Primers listed in table-1 are used for construction of thevectors. A example of the PCR programme is 1 cycle of 94° for 2 minutes,followed by 25 cycles of 94° for 5 seconds, 53° C. for 5 seconds and 72°C. for 90 seconds, followed by 1 cycles of 72° C. for 10 minutes, andthen hold at 4° C. The Expand hifidelity Taq DNA polymerase is purchasedfrom Roche.

TABLE 1 Primers used for construction ofthe A6 TCR phage display vectors Primer name Sequence 5′ to 3′ YOL1TAATAATACGTATAATAATATTCTATTTCAAGGAG ACAGTC (SEQ ID 39) YOL2CAATCCAGCGGCTGCCGTAGGCAATAGGTATTTCA TTATGACTGTCTCCTTGAAATAG (SEQ ID 40)YOL3 CtaCGGCAGCCGCTGGATTGTTATTACTCGCGGCC CAGCCGGCCATGGCccag (SEQ ID 41)YOL4 GTTCTGCTCCACTTCCTTCTGGGCCATGGCCGGCT GGGCCG (SEQ ID 42) YOL5CAGAAGGAAGTGGAGCAGAAC (SEQ ID 43) YOL6CTTCTTAAAGAATTCTTAATTAACCTAGGTTATTA GGAACTTTCTGGGCTGGGGAAG (SEQ ID 44)YOL7 GTTAATTAAGAATTCTTTAAGAAGGAGATATACATATGAAAAAATTATTATTCGCAATTC (SEQ ID 45) YOL8CGCGCTGTGAGAATAGAAAGGAACAACTAAAGGAATTGCGAATAATAATTTTTTCATATG (SEQ ID 46) YOL9CTTTCTATTCTCACAGCGCGCAGGCTGGTGTCACT CAGAC (SEQ ID 47) YOL10ATGATGTCTAGATGCGGCCGCGTCTGCTCTACCCC AGGCCTC (SEQ ID 48) YOL11GCATCTAGACATCATCACCATCATCACTAGACTGT TGAAAGTTGTTTAGCAAAAC (SEQ ID 49)YOL12 CTAGAGGGTACCTTATTAAGACTCCTTATTACGCA GTATG (SEQ ID 50)

EXAMPLE 3 Expression of Fusions of Bacterial Coat Protein andHeterodimeric A6 TCR in E. coli

In order to validate the construct made in Example 2, phage particlesdisplaying the heterodimeric A6 TCR containing a non-native disulfideinter-chain bond were prepared using methods described previously forthe generation of phage particles displaying antibody scFvs (Li et al,2000, Journal of Immunological Methods 236: 133-146) with the followingmodifications. E. coli XL-1-Blue cells containing pEX746:A6 phagemid(i.e. the phagemid encoding the soluble A6 TCR α chain and an A6 TCR βchain fused to the phage gIII protein produced as described in Example2) were used to inoculate 5 ml of Lbatg (Lennox L broth containing 100m/ml of ampicillin, 12.5 μg/ml tetracycline and 2% glucose), and thenthe culture was incubated with shaking at 37° C. overnight (16 hours).50 μl of the overnight culture was used to inoculate 5 ml of TYPatg (TYPis 16 g/l of peptone, 16 g/l of yeast extract, 5 g/l of NaCl and 2.5 g/lof K₂HPO₄), and then the culture was incubated with shaking at 37° C.until OD_(600 nm)=0.8. Helper phage M13 K07 was added to the culture tothe final concentration of 5×10⁹ pfu/ml. The culture was then incubatedat 37° C. stationary for thirty minutes and then with shaking at 200 rpmfor further 30 minutes.

The medium of above culture was then changed to TYPak (TYP containing100 μg/ml of ampicillin, 25 μg/ml of kanamycin), the culture was thenincubated at 25° C. with shaking at 250 rpm for 36 to 48 hours. Theculture was then centrifuged at 4° C. for 30 minutes at 4000 rpm. Thesupernatant was filtrated through a 0.45 μm syringe filter and stored at4° C. for further concentration or analysis.

The fusion protein of filamentous coat protein and heterodimeric A6 TCRcontaining a non-native disulfide inter-chain bond was detected in thesupernatant by western blotting. Approximately 10¹¹ cfu phage particleswere loaded on each lane of an SDS-PAGE gel in both reducing andnon-reducing loading buffer. Separated proteins were primary-antibodyprobed with an anti-M13 gIII mAb, followed by a second antibodyconjugated with Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP). The HRP activity was thendetected with Opti-4CN substrate kit from Bio-Rad (FIG. 5). Theses dataindicated that disulfide-bonded A6 TCR of clone 1 is fused withfilamentous phage coat protein, gIII protein.

EXAMPLE 4 Detection of Functional Heterodimeric A6 TCR Containing aNon-Native Disulfide Inter-Chain Bond on Filamentous Phage Particles

The presence of functional (HLA-A2-tax binding) A6 TCR displayed on thephage particles was detected using a phage ELISA method.

TCR-Phage ELISA

Binding of the A6 TCR-displaying phage particles to immobilisedpeptide-MHC in ELISA is detected with primary rabbit anti-fd antisera(Sigma) followed by alkaline phosphatase (AP) conjugated anti-Rabbit mAb(Sigma). Non specific protein binding sites in the plates can be blockedwith 2% MPBS or 3% BSA-PBS

Materials and reagents

-   -   1. Coating buffer, PBS    -   2. PBS: 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na₂HPO₄, 2 mM KH₂PO₄    -   3. MPBS, 3% marvel-PBS    -   4. PBS-Tween: PBS, 0.1% Tween-20    -   5. Substrate solution, Sigma FAST pNPP, Cat# N2770

Method

-   -   1. Rinse NeutrAvidin coated wells twice with PBS.    -   2. Add 25 μl of biotin-HLA-A2 Tax or biotin-HLA-A2 NYESO in PBS        at concentration of 10 μg/ml, and incubate at room temperature        for 30 to 60 min.    -   3. Rinse the wells twice with PBS    -   4. Add 300 μl of 3% Marvel-PBS, and incubate at room temperature        for 1 hr. Mix the TCR-phage suspension with 1 volume of 3%        Marvel-PBS and incubate at room temperature.    -   5. Rinse the wells twice with PBS    -   6. Add 25 μl of the mixture of phage-A6 TCR/Marvel-PBS, incubate        on ice for 1 hr    -   7. Rinse the wells three times with ice-cold PBStween, and three        times with ice-cold PBS.    -   8. Add 25 μl of ice cold rabbit anti-fd antibody diluted 1:1000        in Marvel-PBS, and incubate on ice for 1 hr    -   9. Rinse the wells three times with ice-cold PBStween, and three        times with ice-cold PBS.    -   10. Add 25 μl of ice cold anti-rabbit mAb-Ap conjugate diluted        1:50,000 in Marvel-PBS, and incubate on ice for 1 hr    -   11. Rinse the wells three times with ice-cold PBStween, and        three times with ice-cold PBS.    -   12. Add 150 μl of Alkaline phosphatase yellow to each well and        read the signal at 405 nm

The results presented in FIG. 6 indicate clone 1 produced a phageparticle displaying an A6 TCR that can bind specifically to its cognatepMHC. (HLA-A2 Tax)

Analysis of the DNA sequence of this displayed A6 TCR revealed thepresence of an ‘opal’ stop codon in the TCR β chain not present in thecorresponding sequence of the expression vector construct of Example 2.This codon is ‘read-through’ with low frequency by ribosomes of the E.coli strain utilised resulting in the insertion of a tryptophan residueat this site and a much-reduced overall level of full-length β chainexpression. From this observation it was inferred that only cellsexpressing this mutated A6 TCR sequence had survived the culture roundsof Example 3, and that therefore the high levels of A6 TCR predicted tobe expressed by the original expression vector were toxic to the hostcells.

EXAMPLE 5 Single-Chain TCR (scTCR) Ribosome Display

Construction of Ribosome Display scTCR Vectors for Use in Generation ofRibosome Display PCR Templates.

Ribosome display constructs were cloned into the readily available DNAplasmid pUC19 in order to generate an error free and stable DNA PCRtemplate from which to conduct subsequent ribosome display experiments.Vector construction was undertaken in two steps so as to avoid the useof large oligonucleotide primers (with their associated error problems).The fma1 A6 scTCR-C-Kappa DNA ribosome display construct is shown in aschematic form in FIG. 7a and both DNA and protein sequences are shownin FIG. 7b . This construct can be excised from pUC19 as a Pst1/EcoR1double digest.

The molecular cloning methods for constructing the vectors are describedin “Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, by J. Sambrook and D. W.Russell”. Primers listed in Table 2 are used for construction of thevectors. The PCR programme utilised was as follows—1 cycle of 94° C. for2 minutes, followed by 25 cycles of 94° C. for 30 seconds, 55° C. for 20seconds and 72° C. for 120 seconds, followed by 1 cycles of 72° C. for 5minutes, and then hold at 4° C. The Pfu DNA polymerase is purchased fromStrategene. Oligonucleotide primers used are described in table 2.

Construction of pUC19-T7—Step 1

The construction of pUC19-T7 is described below, the constructionresults in a pUC19 vector containing a T7 promoter region followed by ashort space region and the an optimum eukaryotic Kozak sequence. This isan essential part of the ribosome display construct as it is requiredfor the initiation of transcription of any attached sequence in rabbitreticulocyte lysates. Sequences for ribosome display such as theA6scTCR-Ckappa can be ligated into the pUC19-T7 vector between the Nco1and EcoR1 restriction sites.

Equimolar amounts of the primer Rev-link and For-link were annealed byheating to 94° C. for 10 min and slowly cooling the reaction to roomtemperature. This results in the formation of a double stranded DNAcomplex that can be seen below.

(SEQ ID 51) 5′ AGCTGCAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAACAGGCCACCATGGCGTCGATTATGCTGAGTGATATCCTTGTCCGGTGGT ACCCTAG 3′

The 5′ region contains an overhanging sticky end complimentary to aHindIII restriction site whilst the 3′ end contains a sticky end that iscomplimentary to a BamH1 restriction site.

The annealed oligonucleotides were ligated into Hind III/BamHIdouble-digested pUC19 which had been purified by agarose gelelectrophoresis, excised and further purified with the Qiagen gelextraction kit. The ligations were transformed into E. coli XL1-BLUE.Individual pUC19-T7 clones were sequenced to confirm the presence of thecorrect sequence. The sequence is shown in FIG. 8.

Construction of A6scTCR-C-Kappa Vector—Step 2.

Construction of the single chain A6scTCR-C-Kappa DNA sequence requiresthe generation of three PCR fragments that must then be assembled intoone A6scTCR-C-Kappa fragment. The fragments consist of (a.) the A6 TCRalpha chain variable region flanked by a Nco1 site in the 5′ region anda section of Glycine Serine linker in the 3′ region flanked by a BamH1restriction site. This product was generated via a standard PCR of thevector pEX202 with the primers 45 and 50 (See Table 2). Fragment (b.) A6TCR beta variable and constant region flanked by a BamH1 restrictionsite in the 5′ region followed by a section of Glycine Serine linker.This product was generated via a standard PCR of the vector pEX207 withthe primers 72 and 73 (See Table 2). Fragment (c.) Portion of a humanC-kappa region generated by a standard PCR of the p147 vector with theprimers 61-60 (See Table 2). All PCR products were run on a 1.6% TBEagarose gel and DNA bands of the correct size excised and purified usingthe Qiagen gel extraction kit.

Fragments (b.) and (c.) were fused by a standard overlap PCR via thecomplementarity in their primer sequences 73 and 61 (See Table 2). ThePCR was carried out via the primers 72 and 60 (See Table 2). The PCRproducts were run on a 1.6% TBE agarose gel and DNA bands of the correctsize excised and purified using the Qiagen gel extraction kit. Thisfragment is termed (d.).

Fragment (a.) was double digested with Nco1 and BamH1 whilst fragment(d.) was double digested with BamH1 and EcoR1. pUC19-T7 was doubledigested with Nco1 and EcoR1. All digested DNA products were run on a1.2% TBE agarose gel and DNA bands of the correct size were excised andpurified using the Qiagen gel extraction kit. The digested pUC19-T7,fragments (a.) and (d.) were ligated and transformed into E. coliXL1-BLUE. Transformants were sequenced to confirm the correct sequence.The sequence of the A6scTCR-C-Kappa ribosome display construct that wascloned into pUC19 is shown in FIG. 9 flanked by its Pst1 and EcoR1sites.

TABLE 2 Oligonucleotides used (Purchased from MWG). Rev-Link5′GATCCCATGGTGGCCTGTTCCTATAGT GAGTCGTATTAGCTGC (SEQ ID 52) For-Link5′AGCTGCAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAG GAACAGGCCACCATGG (SEQ ID 53) 45-A65′CCACCATGGGCCAGAAGGAAGTGGAGC AGAACTC (SEQ ID 54) 7 A6-Beta5′CGAGAGCCCGTAGAACTGGACTTG  (RT-PCR)(a) (SEQ ID 55) 49-A6-BamH1-F5′GTGGATCCGGCGGTGGCGGGTCGAACG CTGGTGTCACTCAGACCCC (SEQ ID 56)50-A6-BamH1-R 5′CCGGATCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCGGTGACCACAACCTGGGTCCCTG  (SEQ ID 57) 60-Kappa-rev-5′CTGAGAATTCTTATGACTCTCCGCGGT EcoR1 TGAAGCTC (SEQ ID 58) 61-Betac-5′TGACGAATTCTGACTCTCCGCGGTTGA Kappa-for1 AGCTC (SEQ ID 59) 71 T7-Primer5′AGCTGCAGCTAATACGACTCACTATAG G (SEQ ID 60) 72 A6-beta5′GGCCACCATGGGCAACGCTGGTGTCAC TCAGACCCC (SEQ ID 61) 73-A6-cons-rev5′TGAACCGCCTCCACCGTCTGCTCTACC CCAGGCCTCGGCG (SEQ ID 62) 75 Kappa-rev5′TGACTCTCCGCGGTTGAAGCTC  (SEQ ID 63)Demonstration of the Production of Sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa by In VitroTranscription Translation.

Preparation of scA6 TCR-C-Kappa PCR Product for In Vitro TranscriptionTranslation.

Here we describe the synthesis of sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa via In vitrotranscription translation in the presence of biotinylated lysine and itssubsequent detection by western blotting and detection with alkalinephosphatase labelled streptavidin.

The sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa PCR product was prepared in a standard PCRreaction using the vector sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa as template and PCR primers71 and 60. Primer 60 contains a stop codon to allow the release of thescTCR from the ribosome. Pfu polymerase (Strategene) was used forincreased fidelity during PCR synthesis. The PCR products were run on a1.6% TBE agarose gel and DNA bands of the correct size excised andpurified using the Qiagen gel extraction kit.

The transcription translation reactions were carried out using theAmbion PROTEINscript II Linked transcription translation kit Cat1280-1287 with 300 ng of the above described PCR product. Threetranscription translation reactions were set up according to themanufactures protocol. The one modification was the addition ofbiotinylated lysine from the Transcend™ Non-Radioactive TranslationDetection System.

Reaction 1 sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa 300 ng with 2 μl biotinylated lysine

Reaction 2 sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa 300 ng without 2 μl biotinylated lysine

Reaction 3 No DNA control with 2 μl biotinylated lysine.

Two microliters of each reaction was run on a 4-20% Novex gradientSDS-PAGE gel (Invitrogen). Additionally a number of dilutions of acontrol biotinylated TCR were also run. The gel was blotted and theproteins detected with streptavidin alkaline phosphatase andsubsequently colometrically developed with Western Blue® StabilizedSubstrate for Alkaline Phosphatase as described in the Transcend™Non-Radioactive Translation Detection System protocol. The western blotis shown in FIG. 10.

In the no DNA control and A6scTCR-C-Kappa reaction without biotinylatedlysine no band of approximately the correct size can be seen as expectedwhilst in the A6scTCR-C-Kappa reaction in the presence of biotinylatedlysine a band of approximately the correct size can be seen. Thisdemonstrates the synthesis of the sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa TCR by In vitrotranscription translation.

Preparation of Sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa Ribosome Display PCR Product.

The sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa PCR product was prepared in a standard PCRreaction using the vector A6scTCR-C-Kappa as template and PCR primers 71and 75 (See Table 2). Primer 75 does not contain a stop codon. Pfupolymerase (Strategene) was used for increased fidelity during PCRsynthesis. The PCR products were run on a 1.6% TBE agarose gel and DNAbands of the correct size were excised and purified using the Qiagen gelextraction kit.

Ribosome Display Process

Transcription and Translation of Sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa

The transcription/translation reactions were carried out using theAmbion PROTEINscript II Linked transcription translation kit (Cat No.1280-1287)

Transcription Reactions

The following transcription reactions were set up in Ambion 0.5 ml nonstick tubes (Cat No. 12350).

Contents Tube 1 (Normal A6) Tube 2 (Control) Water 4.53 μl   5.7 μl Template (PCR Sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa No DNA product) PCR product 1.17 μl (300ng) 5X transcription mix  2 μl  2 μl Enzyme mix  2 μl  2 μl SuperasinRnase inhibitor 0.3 μl  0.3 μl  ambion Final volume 10 μl 10 μl

The tubes were incubated at 30° C. for 60 min on a PCR block with thehot lid off.

Translation Reactions

The following translation reactions were set up in Ambion 0.5 ml nonstick tubes.

Contents 1 (Normal A6) 2 (Control) Reticulocyte Lysate 105 μl  105 μl 25 mM Mg-Acetate  3 μl  3 μl Translation Mix 7.5 μl  7.5 μl  Methionine7.5 μl  7.5 μl  Water 18 μl 18 μl Superasin Rnase inhibitor  3 μl  3 μlTranscription reaction 6 μl tube 1 above 6 μl tube 2 above

Each tube contains enough for 3×50 μl selections. The tubes were mixedand incubated at 30° C. for 60 min on a PCR block with the hot lid off.After 30 min 3 Unit of RQ1 Rnase free Dnase (Promega) was added todestroy the original DNA template in tube 1 and 3 Unit RQ1 Rnase freeDnase (Promega) in tube 2. After 60 min 18 μl of Heparin solution wasadded to translation reaction 2 and 18 μl of Heparin solution was addedto translation reaction 1. Samples were stored on ice ready forselection against HLA-coated beads.

Coating of Magnetic Beads.

20 μl of resuspended Streptavidin Magnetic Particles (Roche Cat. No.1641778) were transferred into a sterile Rnase free 1.5 ml eppendorftube. The beads were immobilised with a Magnetic Particle Separator(Roche Cat. No. 1641794) and the supernatant was removed. The beads werethen washed with 100 μl of Rnase free 1×PBS (10×PBS Ambion Cat No. 9624,Ambion H₂O Cat No. 9930) the beads were immobilised and the supernatantwas removed. A total of 3 PBS washes were carried out.

The beads were resuspended in 20 μl of PBS and the contents split evenlybetween two tubes (10 μl each). One tube will be used to producecontrol-blocked beads and the other tubes to produce HLA-A2-Tax coatedbeads.

To the control beads tube 80 μl of BSA/Biotin solution was added andmixed. The BSA/Biotin solution was made up as follows. 10 μl of a 0.2MTris base 0.1M Biotin solution was added to 990 μl of PBS 0.1% BSA(Ambion Ultrapure Cat No. 2616). Also 20 μl of Heparin solution (138mg/ml Heparin (Sigma H-3393) in 1×PBS) was added and the solution mixed.The beads were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour withintermittent mixing. The beads were then washed three times with 100 μlof PBS and were resuspended in 10 μl of PBS, 0.1% BSA.

The HLA-TAX coated beads were prepared as follows. 40 μl ofHLA-A2-Tax(1.15 mg/ml prepared as described in WO99/60120) was added tothe 10 μl of beads and mixed. The beads were incubated at roomtemperature for 15 min and then 20 μl of BSA 50 mg/ml Ambion Cat 2616and 20 μl of heparin solution (see above) were added and mixed. Thebeads were incubated for a further 45 min and then 20 μl of BSA/Biotinsolution was added. The beads were then washed three times with 100 μlof PBS and were re-suspended in 10 μl of PBS, 0.1% BSA.

Panning with Magnetic Beads

The sc A6 TCR translation reaction was split into three 50 μl aliquotsand each aliquot received either 2 μl of the following beads:

Control (no HLA)

HLA-A2-Tax

HLA-A2-Tax plus 10 μg soluble scA6 TCR

A control translation reaction was also carried out and split into three50 μl aliquots and each aliquot received either 2 μl of the followingbeads

Control (no HLA)

HLA-A2-Tax

HLA-A2-Tax plus 10 g soluble sc A6 TCR

This gave a total of six tubes. The tubes were incubated on a PCR blockat 5° C. for 60 min with intermittent mixing.

The beads were then washed three times with 100 μl ice cold buffer (PBS,5 mM Mg-acetate, 0.2% Tween 20(Sigma Rnase free). Each aliquot of beadswere then re-suspended in 50 μl of 1×RQ1 Dnase digestion buffercontaining 1 μl (40 U) of Superasin and 1 μl (1 U) of RQ1 Dnase. Thebeads were incubated on a PCR block for 30 min at 30° C.

The beads were then washed three times with 100 μl ice cold buffer (PBS,5 mM Mg-acetate, 0.2% Tween 20) and once with ice cold H₂O. The beadswere re-suspended in 10 μl of Rnase free H₂O. The beads were then frozenready for RT-PCR.

RT-PCR of Sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa mRNA on Beads Rescued from the RibosomeDisplay Reactions.

The RT PCR reactions on the beads were carried out using the Titan onetube RT-PCR kit cat 1855476 as described in the manufacturers protocols.Two microliters of beads were added into each RT-PCR reaction along withthe primers 45 and 7 and 0.3 μl of Superasin Rnase inhibitor.

For each RT-PCR reaction a second PCR only reaction was set up whichdiffered only by the fact that no reverse transcriptase was present justRoche high fidelity polymerase. This second reaction served as a controlfor DNA contamination.

Additionally a RT-PCR positive control control was set up using 1ng ofthe vector sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa.

The reactions were cycled as follows. An RT-PCR step was carried out byincubation of the samples at 50° C. for 30 min followed by theinactivation of the reverse transcriptase by incubation at 94° C. for 3min on a PCR block.

The reactions were PCR cycles as follows for a total of 38 cycles:

94° C. 30 seconds

55° C. 20 seconds

68° C. 130 seconds.

The PCR reaction was finished by incubation at 72° C. for 4 minutes.

Great care was taken during all ribosome display steps to avoid Rnasecontamination. The RT-PCR and PCR reactions were run on a 1.6% TBEagarose gel which can be seen in FIG. 11. Analysis of the gel shows thatthere is no DNA contamination and that all PCR products are derived frommRNA. The DNA band of the correct size in lane 2 demonstrates thatribosome displayed sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa was selected out by HLA-A2-Taxcoated beads. Lane 3 shows that we can inhibit this specific selectionof ribosome-displayed sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa by the addition of soluble sc A6TCR. The significant reduction in the band intensity in lane 3 relativeto the uninhibited sample in lane 2 demonstrates this. No binding ofribosome-displayed sc A6 TCR-C-Kappa could be shown against controlnon-HLA coated beads.

EXAMPLE 6 Sequence Analysis of A6 TCR Clones Displayed on PhageParticles and Methods to Improve Display Characteristics

After the construction of vectors for displaying A6 TCR on phage by PCRand molecular cloning, bacterial clones that can produce phage particlesdisplaying A6 TCR were screened by phage ELISA as described in Example4. Three different clones were identified that gave specific binding toHLA-A2-tax in the ELISA binding assay. These clones all containedmutations in the ‘wild-type’ A6 TCR DNA or in the associated regulatorysequences, which are described in the following table:

Functional clones from screening TCR A6 displayed on phage

Name Feature Clone 7 The third ribosome-binding site, which is locatedin front of vβ gene, is mutated from AAGGAGA to AAGGGGA. Clone 9 An opalcodon is introduced in vβ Full DNA and amino CDR3. acid sequence in FIG.12a & 12b Clone 49 An amber codon is introduced in vβ Full DNA sequenceFR1. This mutation introduces a ‘silent’ in FIGS. 13a mutation that doesnot affect the resulting amino acid sequence

These clones all contained mutations that are likely to cause areduction in the expression levels of the A6 TCR chain. It was inferredthat low expression clones were selected over high expression clones asa result of cell toxicity caused by high expression levels of TCR.

EXAMPLE 7 Mutagenesis of A6 TCR CDR3 regions

The CDR3 regions of the A6 TCR were targeted for the introduction ofmutations to investigate the possibility of generating high affinitymutants.

Overlapping PCR was used to modify the sequence of α and β CDR3 regionsto introduce two unique restriction sites Hind III for α chain, witholigos of YOL54,

(SEQ ID 64) 5′CAGCTGGGGGAAGCTTCAGTTTGGAGCAG3′ and YOL55, (SEQ ID 65)5′CTGCTCCAAACTGAAGCTTCCCCCAGCTG3′, and Xho I for βchain, with oligos of YOL56 (SEQ ID 66)5′GTACTTCTGTGCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAG3′ and YOL57 (SEQ ID 67)5′CTAGTCCCGGCCTCGAGGCACAGAAGTAC3′.PCR was used to introduce mutations for affinity maturation. The A6 TCRclone 9 (incorporating an introduced opal codon in the β change CDR3sequence) was used as a source of template DNA, and TCR chains wereamplified with the mutation primers (detailed in the following table)and YOL22 5′CATTTTCAGGGATAGCAAGC3′ (SEQ ID 68) (β-chains) or YOL135′TCACACAGGAAACAGCTATG3′ (SEQ ID 69) (α-chains).

Primers for introducing mutation at CDR3 of A6 β chain and α chain

Primer name Sequence 5′ to 3′ YOL59 TGTGCCTCGAGGNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKCGACCAGAGCAGTACTTCG (SEQ ID 70) YOL60 TGTGCCTCGAGGCCGNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKCCAGAGCAGTACTTCGGGC (SEQ ID 71) YOL61 TGTGCCTCGAGGCCGNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKCGACCAGAGCAGTACTTCG (SEQ ID 72) YOL62 TGTGCCTCGAGGCCGNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKGGAGGGCGACCAGAGCAG (SEQ ID 73) YOL63 TGTGCCTCGAGGCCGGGANNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKGGGCGACCAGAGCAGTAC (SEQ ID 74) YOL68TGTGCCTCGAGGNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKCCA GAGCAGTACTTCGggc (SEQ ID 75) YOL69TGTGCCTCGAGGNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKGAG CAGTACTTCGggccg (SEQ ID 76) YOL70TGTGCCTCGAGGNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKNNKCAG TACTTCGggccgggc (SEQ ID 77) YOL71TGTGCCTCGAGGccgNNKNNKNNKNNKgggCGA CCAGAGCAGTACTTCG (SEQ ID 78) YOL58AAACTGAAGCTTMNNMNNMNNMNNMNNTGTAAC GGCACAGAGGTAG (SEQ ID 79) YOL72AAACTGAAGCTTMNNMNNgctgtcMNNTGTAAC GGCACAGAGGTAG (SEQ ID 80) YOL73AAACTGAAGCTTMNNMNNMNNgctgtcMNNTGT AACGGCACAGAGGTAG (SEQ ID 81) YOL74AAACTGAAGCTTMNNMNNgctgtcMNNAACGGC ACAGAGGTAG (SEQ ID 82)

α-chain fragments were digested with Nco I and HindIII andre-purifiedusing a Qiagen kit and vector was prepared by digesting clone 9 with NcoI and HindIII followed by gel purification using a Qiagen kit. β-chainfragments were digested with Xho I and Not I andre-purified using aQiagen kit and vector was prepared by digesting clone 9 with Xho I andNot I followed by gel purification using a Qiagen kit. Purified insertsand vectors at 3:1 molar ratio were mixed with T4 ligase buffer, T4ligase and nuclease-free water. The ligations were carried out at 16° C.water bath overnight. For each mutation-library, a total of 0.5 to 1 μgpurified ligated products were electroporated into E. coli TG1 at ratioof 0.2 μg DNA per 40 μl of electroporation-competent cells (Stratagen)following the protocols provided by the manufacturer. Afterelectroporation, the cells were re-suspended immediately with 960 μl ofSOC medium at 37° C. and plated on a 244 mm×244 mm tissue culture platecontaining YTE (15 g Bacto-Agar, 8 g NaCl, 10 g Tryptone, 5 g YeastExtract in liter) supplemented with 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 2% glucose.The plate was incubated at 30° C. over night. The cells were thenscraped from the plates with 5 ml of DYT (16 g Trytone, 10 g Yeastextract and 5 g NaCl in liter, autoclaved at 125° C. for 15 minutes)supplemented with 15% glycerol.

In order to make phage particles displaying the A6 TCR, 500 ml of DYTag(DYT containing 100 μl/ml of ampicillin and 2% glucose) was inoculatedwith 500 to 1000 μl of the library stocks. The culture was grown untilOD(600 nm) reached 0.5. 100 ml of the culture was infected with helperphage (M13 K07 (Invitrogen), or HYPER PHAGE (Progen Biotechnik, GmbH69123 Heidelberg), and incubated at 37° C. water bath for 30 minutes.The medium was replaced with 100 ml of DYTak (DYT containing 100 μg/mlampicillin and 25 μg/ml of kanamycin). The culture was then incubatedwith shaking at 300 rpm and 25° C. for 20 to 36 hours.

EXAMPLE 8 Isolation of High Affinity A6 TCR Mutants

The isolation of high affinity A6 TCR mutants was carried out using twodifferent methods.

The first method involves selecting phage particles displaying mutant A6TCRs capable of binding to HLA-A2 Tax complex using Maxisorpimmuno-tubes (Invitrogen) The immuno-tubes were coated with 1 to 2 ml 10μg/ml streptavidin in PBS overnight at room temperature. The tubes werewashed twice with PBS, and then 1 ml of biotinylated HLA-A2 Tax complexat 5 μg/ml in PBS was added and incubated at room temperature for 30minutes. The rest of the protocol for selection of high affinity bindersis as described previously (Li et al. (2000) Journal of ImmunologicalMethods 236: 133-146), except for the following modifications. Theselection was performed over three or four rounds. The concentrations ofbiotinylated HLA-A2 Tax complex were 5 μg/ml for the first round ofselection, 0.5 μg/ml for the second, 0.05 μg/ml for the third and 0.005μg/ml for the fourth round of selection. M13 K07 helper phage were usedin rounds one and two, and hyper phage were used in subsequent rounds,for the selection.

The second method utilised was the selection of phage particlesdisplaying mutant A6 TCRs capable of binding to HLA-A2 Tax complex insolution. Streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads (Dynal M280) werepre-washed according to manufacturer's protocols. Phage particles,displaying mutated A6 TCR at a concentration of 10¹² to 10¹³ cfu, werepre-mixed with biotinylated HLA-A2 Tax complex at concentrations of2×10⁻⁸M, 2×10⁻⁹M, 2×10⁻¹° M and 2×10⁻¹¹M for first, second, third andfourth-round of selections respectively. The mixture of A6TCR-displaying phage particles and HLA-A2 Tax complex was incubated forone hour at room temperature with gentle rotation, and A6 TCR-displayingphage particles bound to biotinylated HLA-A2 Tax complex were capturedusing 200 μl (round 1) or 50 μl (round 2, 3, and 4) ofstreptavidin-coated M280 magnetic beads. After capture of the phageparticles, the beads were washed a total often times (three times inPBStween20, twice in PBStween 20 containing 2% skimmed milk powder,twice in PBS, once in PBS containing 2% skimmed milk powder, and twicein PBS) using a Dynal magnetic particle concentrator. After final wash,the beads was re-suspended in 1 ml of freshly prepared 100 mMtriethylamine pH11.5, and incubated for 5 to 10 minutes at roomtemperature with gentle rotation.

Phage particles eluted from the beads were neutralized immediately with300 μl of 1M tris-HCl pH7.0. Half of the eluate was used to infect 10 mlof E. coli TG1 at OD(600 nm)=0.5 freshly prepared for the amplificationof the selected phage particles according to the methods previouslydescribed (Li et al., (2000) Journal of Immunological Methods 236:133-146).

After the third or fourth round of selection, 95 colonies were pickedfrom the plates and used to inoculate 100 μl of DYTag in a 96-wellmicrotiter plate. The culture was incubated at 37° C. with shakingovernight. 100 μl of DYTag was then sub-inoculated with 2 to 5 μl of theovernight cultures, and incubated at 37° C. with shaking for 2 to 3hours or until the culture became cloudy. To infect the cells withhelper phage, the culture was infected with 25 μl of DYTag containing5×10⁹ pfu helper phages, and incubated at 37° C. for 30 minutes. Themedium was replaced with DYTak. The plates were incubated at 25° C. for20 to 36 hours with shaking at 300 rpm. The cells were precipitated bycentrifugation at 3000 g for 10 minutes at 4° C. Supernatants were usedto screen for high affinity A6 TCR mutants by competitive phage ELISA asfollows.

Nunc-Immuno Maxisorp wells coated with streptavidin were rinsed twicewith PBS. 25 μl 5 μg/ml biotinylated HLA-A2-Tax complex was added toeach well and these were incubated at room temperature for 30 to 60minutes, and followed by two PBS rinses. Non-specific protein bindingsites in the wells were blocked by the addition of 300 μl 3% skimmedmilk in PBS followed by incubation at room temperature for 2 hours. Inorder to prepare phage particles displaying the heterodimric A6 TCR,phage particles were mixed with 3% skimmed milk in PBS containing 0, 20,and 200 nM HLA-A2-Tax, followed by incubated at room temperature for 1hour. The phage is added to the wells coated with HLA-A2-Tax andincubated at room temperature for 1 hour, followed by 3 washes with PBScontaining 0.1% tween 20 and then 3 washes with PBS. The boundTCR-displaying phage particles are detected with an anti-fd antibody(Sigma) as described in Example 4.

Several putative high affinity A6 TCR mutants were identified, and theCDR3 sequences are listed in the two following tables along with thecorresponding wild-type sequences. Amber stop codons (X) were found inall β chain mutants and one α chain mutant.

A6 TCR β chain mutants clone CDR3 sequence WildGCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCAGAGCAGTAG Type (SEQ ID 83)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  E  Q  Y (SEQ ID 84) 14GCCTCGAGGCCGGGGCTGATGAGTGCGTAGCCAGAGCAGTAC (SEQ ID 85)A  S  R  P  G  L  M  S  A  X  P  E  Q  Y (SEQ ID 86) 86GCCTCGAGGCCGGGGCTGAGGTCGGCGTAGCCAGAGCAGTAC (SEQ ID 87)A  S  R  P  G  L  R  S  A  X  P  E  Q  Y (SEQ ID 88) 87GCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCAGAGGCGTAG (SEQ ID 89)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  E  A  X (SEQ ID 90) 89GCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCAGAGGATTAG (SEQ ID 91)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  E  D  X (SEQ ID 92) 85GCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCAGATCAGTAG (SEQ ID 93)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  D  Q  X (SEQ ID 94) 83GCCTCGAGGCCGGGTCTGTAGGCTGGGCGACCAGAGCAGTAC (SEQ ID 95)A  S  R  P  G  L  X  A  G  R  P  E  Q  Y (SEQ ID 96) 1GCCTCGAGGCCGGGGCTGGTTCCGGGGCGACCAGAGCAGTAG (SEQ ID 97)A  S  R  P  G  L  V  P  G  R  P  E  Q  X (SEQ ID 98) 2GCCTCGAGGCCGGGGCTTGTGTCTGCTTAGCCAGAGCAGTAC (SEQ ID 99)A  S  R  P  G  L  V  S  A  X  P  E  Q  Y (SEQ ID 100) 111GCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCACATCCGTAG (SEQ ID 101)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  H  P  X (SEQ ID 102) 125GCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCAGATGCGTAG (SEQ ID 103)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  D  A  X (SEQ ID 104) 133GCCTCGAGGCCGGGTCTGATTAGTGCTTAGCCAGAGCAGTAC (SEQ ID 105)A  S  R  P  G  L  I  S  A  X  P  E  Q  Y (SEQ ID 106) A6 TCR αchain mutants Clone CDR3 Wild GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAAGCTTCAG Type(SEQ ID 107) A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  K  L  Q (SEQ ID 108) 149GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGCCGCTTCAG (SEQ ID 109)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  P  L  Q (SEQ ID 110) 65GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAAGATGCAG (SEQ ID 111)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  K  M  Q (SEQ ID 112) 66GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAAGTTGCAT (SEQ ID 113)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  K  L  H (SEQ ID 114) 153GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGTAGCTTCAT (SEQ ID 115)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  X  L  H (SEQ ID 116) 71GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGGAGCTTCAT (SEQ ID 117)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  E  L  H (SEQ ID 118) 70GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAGGCTGCAT (SEQ ID 119)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  R  L  H (SEQ ID 120) 121GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGCAGCTTCAT (SEQ ID 121)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  Q  L  H (SEQ ID 122) 117GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAAGGTTCAT (SEQ ID 123)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  K  V  H (SEQ ID 124) 72GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAAGGTGAAT (SEQ ID 125)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  K  V  N (SEQ ID 126) 150GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAAGCTTCTG (SEQ ID 127)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  K  L  L (SEQ ID 128)

EXAMPLE 9 Production of Soluble Heterodimeric A6 TCR with Non-NativeDisulfide Bond between Constant Regions, Containing CDR3 Mutations

Phagemid DNA encoding the high affinity A6 TCR mutants identified inExample 8 was isolated from the relevant E. coli cells using a Mini-Prepkit (Quiagen, UK)

PCR amplification using the phagemid DNA as a target and the followingprimers was used to amplify the soluble TCR α and β chain DNA sequences.

A6 TCR alpha chain forward primer (SEQ ID 129)

Universal TCR alpha chain reverse primer (SEQ ID 130)

A6 beta chain forward primer (SEQ ID 131)

Universal beta chain reverse primer (SEQ ID 132)

In the case of the TCRchain a further PCR stitching was carried out toreplace the amber stop codon in the CDR3 region with a codon encodingglutamic acid. When an amber stop codon is suppressed in E. coli, aglutamine residue is normally introduced instead of the translationbeing stopped. Therefore, when the amber codon-containing TCR isdisplayed on the surface of phage, it contains a glutamine residue inthis position. However, when the TCR-β chain gene was transferred intothe expression plasmid, a glutamic acid residue was used as analternative to glutamine. The primers used for this PCR stitching wereas follows.

YOL124 (SEQ ID 133) CTGCTCTGGTTCCGCACTC YOL125 (SEQ ID 134)GAGTGCGGAACCAGAGCAG

The DNA sequence of the mutated soluble A6 TCR β chain was verified byautomated sequencing (see FIG. 14a for the mutated A6 TCR β chain DNAsequence and 14 b for the amino acid sequence encoded thereby). FIG. 14cshows the mutated A6 TCR β chain amino acid sequence without theglutamine to glutamic acid substitution, i.e. the sequence that waspresent in Clone 134 as isolated by phage-ELISA.

Theses A6 TCR α and β DNA sequences were then used to produce a solubleA6 TCR as described in WO 03/020763. Briefly, the two chains areexpressed as inclusion bodies in separate E. coli cultures. Theinclusion bodies are then isolated, de-natured and re-folded together invitro.

EXAMPLE 10 BIAcore Surface Plasmon Resonance Characterisation of a HighAffinity A6 TCR Binding to HLA-A2 Tax

A surface plasmon resonance biosensor (BIAcore 3000™) was used toanalyse the binding of the high affinity clone 134 A6 TCR (See FIGS. 15a& 15 b for the full DNA and amino acid sequences of the mutated TCR βchain respectively) to the HLA-A2 Tax ligand. This was facilitated byproducing pMHC complexes (described below) which were immobilised to astreptavidin-coated binding surface in a semi-oriented fashion, allowingefficient testing of the binding of a soluble T-cell receptor to up tofour different pMHC (immobilised on separate flow cells) simultaneously.Manual injection of HLA complex allows the precise level of immobilisedclass I molecules to be manipulated easily.

Biotinylated class I HLA-A2 tax complexes were refolded in vitro frombacterially-expressed inclusion bodies containing the constituentsubunit proteins and synthetic peptide, followed by purification and invitro enzymatic biotinylation (O'Callaghan et al. (1999) Anal. Biochem.266: 9-15). HLA-heavy chain was expressed with a C-terminalbiotinylation tag which replaces the transmembrane and cytoplasmicdomains of the protein in an appropriate construct. Inclusion bodyexpression levels of ˜75 mg/liter bacterial culture were obtained. TheHLA light-chain or 2-microglobulin was also expressed as inclusionbodies in E. coli from an appropriate construct, at a level of ˜500mg/liter bacterial culture.

E. coli cells were lysed and inclusion bodies were purified toapproximately 80% purity. Protein from inclusion bodies was denatured in6 M guanidine-HCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.1, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT, 10 mMEDTA, and was refolded at a concentration of 30 mg/liter heavy chain, 30mg/liter 2 m into 0.4 M L-Arginine-HCl, 100 mM Tris pH 8.1, 3.7 mMcystamine, mM cysteamine, 4 mg/ml peptide (e.g. tax 11-19), by additionof a single pulse of denatured protein into refold buffer at <5° C.Refolding was allowed to reach completion at 4° C. for at least 1 hour.

Buffer was exchanged by dialysis in 10 volumes of 10 mM Tris pH 8.1. Twochanges of buffer were necessary to reduce the ionic strength of thesolution sufficiently. The protein solution was then filtered through a1.5 μm cellulose acetate filter and loaded onto a POROS 50HQ anionexchange column (8 ml bed volume). Protein was eluted with a linear0-500 mM NaCl gradient. HLA-A2-peptide complex eluted at approximately250 mM NaCl, and peak fractions were collected, a cocktail of proteaseinhibitors (Calbiochem) was added and the fractions were chilled on ice.

Biotinylation tagged HLA-A2 complexes were buffer exchanged into 10 mMTris pH 8.1, 5 mM NaCl using a Pharmacia fast desalting columnequilibrated in the same buffer. Immediately upon elution, theprotein-containing fractions were chilled on ice and protease inhibitorcocktail (Calbiochem) was added. Biotinylation reagents were then added:1 mM biotin, 5 mM ATP (buffered to pH 8), 7.5 mM MgCl2, and 5 μg/ml BirAenzyme (purified according to O'Callaghan et al. (1999) Anal. Biochem.266: 9-15). The mixture was then allowed to incubate at room temperatureovernight.

Biotinylated HLA-A2 complexes were purified using gel filtrationchromatography. A Pharmacia Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column waspre-equilibrated with filtered PBS and 1 ml of the biotinylationreaction mixture was loaded and the column was developed with PBS at 0.5ml/min. Biotinylated HLA-A2 complexes eluted as a single peak atapproximately 15 ml. Fractions containing protein were pooled, chilledon ice, and protease inhibitor cocktail was added. Protein concentrationwas determined using a Coomassie-binding assay (PerBio) and aliquots ofbiotinylated HLA-A2 complexes were stored frozen at −20° C. Streptavidinwas immobilised by standard amine coupling methods.

The interactions between the high affinity A6 Tax TCR containing a novelinter-chain bond and the HLA-A2 Tax complex or an irrelevant HLA-A2NY-ESO combination, the production of which is described above, wereanalysed on a BIAcore 3000™ surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor.SPR measures changes in refractive index expressed in response units(RU) near a sensor surface within a small flow cell, a principle thatcan be used to detect receptor ligand interactions and to analyse theiraffinity and kinetic parameters. The probe flow cells were prepared byimmobilising the individual HLA-A2 peptide complexes in separate flowcells via binding between the biotin cross linked onto β2 m andstreptavidin which have been chemically cross linked to the activatedsurface of the flow cells. The assay was then performed by passing sTCRover the surfaces of the different flow cells at a constant flow rate,measuring the SPR response in doing so. Initially, the specificity ofthe interaction was verified by passing soluble A6 TCR at a constantflow rate of 5 μl min-1 over four different surfaces; one coated with˜1000 RU of HLA-A2 Tax complex, the second coated with ˜1000 RU ofHLA-A2 NY-ESO complex, and two blank flow cells coated only withstreptavidin (see FIG. 15).

The increased affinity of the mutated soluble A6 TCR made calculation ofthe kd for the interaction of this moiety with the HLA-A2 Tax complexdifficult. However, the half-life (t_(1/2)) for the interaction wascalculated to be 51.6 minutes (see FIG. 16), which compares to a t_(1/2)for the wild-type interaction of 7.2 seconds.

EXAMPLE 11 Production of Vector Encoding a Soluble NY-ESO TCR Containinga Novel Disulphide Bond

The β chain of the soluble A6 TCR prepared in Example 1 contains in thenative sequence a BglII restriction site (AAGCTT) suitable for use as aligation site.

PCR mutagenesis was carried as detailed below to introduce a BamH1restriction site (GGATCC) into the α chain of soluble A6 TCR, 5′ of thenovel cysteine codon. The sequence described in FIG. 2a was used as atemplate for this mutagenesis. The following primers were used:

(SEQ ID 135)                 |BamHI | 5′-ATATCCAGAACCCgGAtCCTGCCGTGTA-3′(SEQ ID 136) 5′-TACACGGCAGGAaTCcGGGTTCTGGATAT-3′

100 ng of plasmid was mixed with 5 μl 10 mM dNTP, 25 μl 10×Pfu-buffer(Stratagene), 10 units Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and the final volumewas adjusted to 240 μl with H₂O. 48 μl of this mix was supplemented withprimers diluted to give a final concentration of 0.2 μM in 50 μl finalreaction volume. After an initial denaturation step of 30 seconds at 95°C., the reaction mixture was subjected to 15 rounds of denaturation (95°C., 30 sec.), annealing (55° C., 60 sec.), and elongation (73° C., 8min.) in a Hybaid PCR express PCR machine. The product was then digestedfor 5 hours at 37° C. with 10 units of Dpn1 restriction enzyme (NewEngland Biolabs). 10 μl of the digested reaction was transformed intocompetent XL1-Blue bacteria and grown for 18 hours at 37° C. A singlecolony was picked and grown over night in 5 ml TYP+ampicillin (16 g/lBacto-Tryptone, 16 g/l Yeast Extract, 5 g/l NaCl, 2.5 g/l K₂HPO₄, 100mg/l Ampicillin). Plasmid DNA was purified on a Qiagen mini-prep columnaccording to the manufacturer's instructions and the sequence wasverified by automated sequencing at the sequencing facility ofDepartment of Biochemistry, Oxford University.

cDNA encoding NY-ESO TCR was isolated from T cells according to knowntechniques. cDNA encoding NY-ESO TCR was produced by treatment of themRNA with reverse transcriptase.

In order to produce vectors encoding a soluble NY-ESO TCR incorporatinga novel disulphide bond, A6 TCR plasmids containing the α chain BamHIand β chain β chain restriction sites were used as templates. Thefollowing primers were used:

(SEQ ID 137)             | ndeI | 5′-GGAGATATACATATGCAGGAGGTGACACAG-3′(SEQ ID 138) 5′-TACACGGCAGGATCCGGGTTCTGGATATT-3′             | BamHI|(SEQ ID 139)             |NdeI | 5′-GGAGATATACATATGGGTGTCACTCAGACC-3′(SEQ ID 140) 5′-CCCAAGCTTAGTCTGCTCTACCCCAGGCCTCGGC-3′       |BglII|

NY-ESO TCR α and β-chain constructs were obtained by PCR cloning asfollows.

PCR reactions were performed using the primers as shown above, andtemplates containing the native NY-ESO TCR chains. The PCR products wererestriction digested with the relevant restriction enzymes, and clonedinto pGMT7 to obtain expression plasmids. The sequence of the plasmidinserts were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing. FIGS. 17a and 17bshow the DNA sequence of the mutated NY-ESO TCR α and β chainsrespectively, and FIGS. 18a and 18b show the resulting amino acidsequences.

EXAMPLE 12 Construction of Phage Display Vectors and Cloning of DNAEncoding NY-ESO TCR α and β Chains into the Phagemid Vectors

DNA encoding soluble NY-ESO TCR α and β chains incorporating novelcysteine codons to facilitate the formation of a non-native disulfideinter-chain bond, produced as described in Example 11 were incorporatedinto the phagemid vector pEX746 as follows.

The DNA encoding the two NY-ESO TCR chains were individually subjectedto PCR in order to introduce cloning sites compatible with the pEX746phagemid vector (containing DNA encoding A6 TCR clone 7) using thefollowing primers:

For the NY-ESO TCR alpha chain (SEQ ID 141)

(SEQ ID 142)

For the NY-ESO TCR beta chain (SEQ ID 143)

(SEQ ID 144) RT1 CGAGAGCCCGTAGAACTGGACTTG

The molecular cloning methods for constructing the vectors are describedin “Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, by J. Sambrook and D. W.Russell”. Primers listed in table-1 are used for construction of thevectors. A example of the PCR programme is 1 cycle of 94° C. for 2minutes, followed by 25 cycles of 94° C. for 5 seconds, 53° C. for 5seconds and 72° C. for 90 seconds, followed by 1 cycles of 72° C. for 10minutes, and then hold at 4° C. The Expand hifidelity Taq DNA polymeraseis purchased from Roche.

DNA encoding the clone 7 A6 TCR β chain was removed from pEX746 bydigestion with restrictions enzymes BssHII and BglII. Thecorrespondingly digested PCR DNA encoding the NY-ESO β chain was thensubstituted into the phagemid by ligation. The sequence of the cloningproduct was verified by automated sequencing.

Similarly, DNA encoding the clone 7 A6 TCR α chain was removed frompEX746 by digestion with restrictions enzymes Ncoi and AvrII. Thecorrespondingly digested PCR DNA encoding the NY-ESO α chain was thensubstituted into the phagemid already containing DNA encoding the NY-ESOTCR β chain by ligation. The sequence of the cloning product wasverified by automated sequencing.

FIGS. 19a and 19b detail respectively the DNA and amino acid sequence ofthe NY-ESO TCR α and β chain as well as surrounding relevant sequenceincorporated in the phagemid (pEX746:NY-ESO). The sequence preceedingthe NcoI site is the same as pEX746.

EXAMPLE 13 Expression of Fusions of Bacterial Coat Protein andHeterodimeric NY-ESO TCR in E. coli

Phage particles displaying the heterodimeric NY-ESO TCR containing anon-native disulfide inter-chain bond were prepared using methodsdescribed previously for the generation of phage particles displayingantibody scFvs (Li et al, 2000, Journal of Immunological Methods 236:133-146) with the following modifications. E. coli TG 1 cells containingpEX746:NY-ESO phagemid (i.e. the phagemid encoding the soluble NY-ESOTCR α chain and an NY-ESO TCR β chain fused to the phage gIII proteinproduced as described in Example 12) were used to inoculate 10 ml of2×TY (containing 100 m/ml of ampicillin and 2% glucose), and then theculture was incubated with shaking at 37° C. overnight (16 hours). 50 μlof the overnight culture was used to inoculate 10 ml of 2×TY (containing100 μg/ml of ampicillin and 2% glucose), and then the culture wasincubated with shaking at 37° C. until OD_(600 nm)=0.8. HYPERPHAGEHelper phage was added to the culture to the final concentration of5×10⁹ pfu/ml. The culture was then incubated at 37° C. stationary forthirty minutes and then with shaking at 200 rpm for further 30 minutes.The medium of above culture was then made up to 50 ml with 2×TY(containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin and 25 μg/ml of kanamycin), theculture was then incubated at 25° C. with shaking at 250 rpm for 36 to48 hours. The culture was then centrifuged at 4° C. for 30 minutes at4000 rpm. The supernatant was filtrated through a 0.45 μm syringe filterand stored at 4° C. for further concentration. The supernatant was thenconcentrated by PEG precipitation and re-suspended in PBS at 10% of theoriginal stored volume.

EXAMPLE 14 Detection of Functional Heterodimeric NY-ESO TCR Containing aNon-Native Disulfide Inter-Chain Bond on Filamentous Phage Particles

The presence of functional (HLA-A2-NY-ESO binding) NY-ESO TCR displayedon the phage particles in the concentrated suspension prepared inExample 13 was detected using the phage ELISA methods described inExample 4. FIG. 20 shows the specific binding of phage particlesdisplaying the NY-ESO TCR to HLA-A2-NY-ESO in a phage ELISA assay.

EXAMPLE 15 Construction of Plasmids for Cellular Expression of HLA-DRAGenes

DNA sequences encoding the extracellular portion of HLA-DRA chains areamplified from eDNA isolated from the blood of a healthy human subject,using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with synthetic DNA primerpairs that are designed to include a Bgl II restriction site.

PCR mutagenesis is then used to add DNA encoding the Fos leucine zipperto the 3′ end of the amplified sequencence.

DNA manipulations and cloning described above are carried out asdescribed in Sambrook, J et al, (1989). Molecular Cloning—A LaboratoryManual. Second Edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA.

FIG. 21 provides the DNA sequence of the HLA-DR β chain ready forinsertion into the bi-cistronic expression vector. This figure indicatesthe position of the codons encoding the Fos leucine zipper peptide andthe biotinylation tag.

Amino acid numbering is based on the mouse sequence (Kabat, 1991,Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th edition, US Dept ofHealth & Human Services, Public Health Service, NIH, Bethesda, Md.1-1137)

This DNA sequence is then inserted into a bi-cistronic baculovirusvector pAcAB3 (See FIG. 22 for the sequence of this vector) along withDNA encoding the corresponding Class II HLA β chain for expression inSf9 insect cells. This vector can be used to express any Class IIHLA-peptide complex in insect cells.

EXAMPLE 16 Construction of Plasmids for Cellular Expression of HLA-DRBWild Type and Mutant Genes

DNA sequences encoding the extracellular portion of HLA-DRβ chains areamplified from eDNA isolated from the blood of a healthy human subject,using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with synthetic DNA primerpairs that are designed to include a BamHI restriction site.

PCR mutagenesis is then used to add DNA encoding the Jun leucine zipperto the 3′ end of the amplified sequence and DNA encoding the Flu HApeptide loaded by the HLA-DRI molecule to the 5′ end of the sequence.

DNA manipulations and cloning described above are carried out asdescribed in Sambrook, J et al, (1989). Molecular Cloning—A LaboratoryManual. Second Edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA.

FIG. 23 provides the DNA sequence of the HLA-DR β chain ready forinsertion into the bi-cistronic expression vector. This figure indicatesthe position of the codons encoding the Jun leucine zipper peptide andthe Flu HA peptide.

Amino acid numbering is based on the mouse sequence (Kabat, 1991,Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th edition, US Dept ofHealth & Human Services, Public Health Service, NIH, Bethesda, Md.1-1137)

This DNA sequence is then inserted into a bi-cistronic baculovirusvector pAcAB3 (See FIG. 22 for the sequence of this vector) along withDNA encoding the corresponding Class II α chain for expression in Sf9insect cells. This vector can be used to express any Class IIHLA-peptide complex in insect cells.

EXAMPLE 17 Expression and Refolding of Class II HLA-DR1—Flu HA Complexes

Class II MHC expression is carried out using the bi-cistronic expressionvectors produced as described in Examples 15 and 16 containing the ClassII HLA-DR1 α and β chains and the Flu HA peptide. The expression andpurification methods used are as described in (Gauthier (1998) PNAS USA95 p 11828-11833). Briefly, soluble HLA-DR1 is expressed in thebaculovirus system by replacing the hydrophobic transmembrane regionsand cytoplasmic segments of DR α and β chains with leucine zipperdimerization domains from the transcription factors Fos and Jun. In theexpression construct, the required Class MHC-loaded Flu HA peptidesequence is covalently linked to the N terminus of the mature DR β chainand the DR α chain contains a biotinylation tag sequence to facilitatebifunctional ligand formation utilizing the biotin/strepavidinmultimerisation methodology. The recombinant protein is secreted by Sf9cells infected with the recombinant baculovirus, and purified byaffinity chromatography. The protein is further purified byanion-exchange HPLC.

EXAMPLE 18 Construction of Class I Soluble Peptide-HLA Molecules

In order to investigate further the specificity of the high affinity A6TCR clone 134 the following soluble class I peptide-HLA molecules wereproduced:

HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 23) (LLGRNSFEV) HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 24)(KLVALGINAV) HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 25) (LLGDLFGV) HLA-B8-peptide(SEQ ID 26) (FLRGRAYGL) HLA-B27-peptide (SEQ ID 27) (HRCQAIRKK)HLA-Cw6-peptide (SEQ ID 28) (YRSGIIAVV) HLA-A24-peptide (SEQ ID 29)(VYGFVRACL) HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 30) (ILAKFLHWL) HLA-A2-peptide(SEQ ID 31) (LTLGEFLKL) HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 33) (GILGFVFTL)HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 34) (SLYNTVATL)

These soluble peptide-HLAs were produced using the methods described inExample 10.

EXAMPLE 19 BIAcore Surface Plasmon Resonance Measurement of theSpecificity of Clone 134 High Affinity A6 TCR Binding to Peptide-HLA

A surface plasmon resonance biosensor (BIAcore 3000™) was used toanalyse the binding specificity of the high affinity clone 134 A6 TCR.(See FIGS. 15a & 15 b for the full DNA and amino acid sequences of themutated TCR β chain respectively) This was carried out using the ClassII HLA-DR1-peptide, produced as described in Examples 15-17, and theClass I peptide-HLA complexes listed in Example 18, produced using themethods detailed in Example 10. The following table lists thepeptide-HLA complexes utilised:

1. HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 23) (LLGRNSFEV) 2. HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 24)(KLVALGINAV) 3. HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 25) (LLGDLFGV) 4. HLA-B8-peptide(SEQ ID 26) (FLRGRAYGL) 5. HLA-B27-peptide (SEQ ID 27) (HRCQAIRKK)6. HLA-Cw6-peptide (SEQ ID 28) (YRSGIIAVV) 7. HLA-A24-peptide(SEQ ID 29) (VYGFVRACL) 8. HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 30) (ILAKFLHWL)9. HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 31) (LTLGEFLKL) 10.HLA-DR1-peptide (SEQ ID 32)(PKYVKQNTLKLA) 11. HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 33) (GILGFVFTL)12. HLA-A2-peptide (SEQ ID 34) (SLYNTVATL)

The above peptide HLAs were immobilised to streptavidin-coated bindingsurfaces in of the flow cells of a BIAcore 3000™ in a semi-orientedfashion.

The BIAcore 3000™ allows testing of the binding of the soluble T-cellreceptor to up to four different pMHC (immobilised on separate flowcells) simultaneously. For this experiment three different HLA-peptideswere immobilised in flowcells 2-4 and flowcell 1 was left blank as acontrol. Manual injection of HLA-peptide complexes allowed the preciselevel of immobilised molecules to be manipulated.

After the ability of the high affinity A6 TCR clone 134 to bind to thefirst 3 HLA-peptide complexes in the above list had been assessed thenext three were immobilised onto these flowcells directly on top of theprevious ones. This process was continued until the binding of the highaffinity A6 TCR clone 134 to all 12 HLA-peptide complexes had beenassessed.

Ten injections of 5 μl of the high affinity A6 TCR clone 134 were passedover each flowcell at at 5 μl/min at concentrations ranging from 4.1ng/ml to 2.1 mg/ml. (See FIGS. 24-28)

As a final control the high affinity A6 TCR clone 134 was passed over aflowcell containing immobilised HLA-A2 Tax (LLFGYPVYV)(SEQ ID 21), thecognate ligand for this TCR.

Specific binding of the high affinity A6 TCR clone 134 was only noted toits cognate ligand. (HLA-A2 Tax (LLFGYPVYV) (SEQ ID 21)) These datafurther demonstrate the specificity of the high affinity A6 TCR clone134. (See FIGS. 24-28)

EXAMPLE 20 Mutagenesis of NY-ESO TCR CDR3 Regions

The CDR3 regions of the NY-ESO TCR were targeted for the introduction ofmutations to investigate the possibility of generating high affinitymutants. This was achieved using NY-ESO TCR-specific PCR primers incombination with methods substantially the same as those detailed inExample 7.

EXAMPLE 21 Isolation of High Affinity A6 TCR Mutants

The isolation of high affinity NY-ESO TCR mutants was carried using outthe first of the two methods described in Example 8.

A single high affinity NY-ESO TCR mutant was identified.

EXAMPLE 22 Production of Soluble High Affinity Heterodimeric NY-ESO TCRwith Non-Native Disulfide Bond Between Constant Regions, ContainingVariable Region Mutations

Phagemid DNA encoding the high affinity NY-ESO TCR mutant identified inExample 21 was isolated from the relevant E. coli cells using aMini-Prep kit (Quiagen, UK)

PCR amplification using the phagemid DNA as a target and the followingprimers were used to amplify the mutated soluble NY-ESO TCR β chainvariable region DNA sequence.

NY-ESO beta chain forward primer (SEQ ID 145)

Universal beta chain reverse primer (SEQ ID 146)

The PCR product was then digested with Age1/Ase1 and cloned into pEX821(Produced as described in Example 11) cut with Nde/Age1.

The mutated NY-ESO TCR β chain DNA sequence amplified as describedabove, and the NY-ESO TCR α chain produced as described in Example 11were then used to produce a soluble high affinity NY-ESO TCR asdescribed in WO 03/020763. Briefly, the two chains are expressed asinclusion bodies in separate E. coli cultures. The inclusion bodies arethen isolated, de-natured and re-folded together in vitro.

EXAMPLE 23 BIAcore Surface Plasmon Resonance Characterisation of a HighAffinity NY-ESO TCR Binding to HLA-A2 NY-ESO

A surface plasmon resonance biosensor (Biacore 3000™) was used toanalyse the binding of the high affinity NY-ESO TCR to the HLA-A2 NY-ESOligand. This was facilitated by producing pMHC complexes (as describedin Example 10) which were immobilised to a streptavidin-coated bindingsurface in a semi-oriented fashion, allowing efficient testing of thebinding of a soluble T-cell receptor to up to four different pMHC(immobilised on separate flow cells) simultaneously. Manual injection ofHLA complex allows the precise level of immobilised class I molecules tobe manipulated easily.

The interactions between the high affinity NY-ESO TCR containing a novelinter-chain bond and the HLA-A2 NY-ESO complex or an irrelevant HLA-A2Tax combination, the production of which is described in Example 10,were analysed on a Biacore 3000™ surface plasmon resonance (SPR)biosensor, again as described in Example 10.

The kd for the interaction of the soluble high affinity NY-ESO with theHLA-A2 NY-ESO was calculated to be 4.1 μm, (See FIGS. 29a and 29b )which compares to a kd of 15.7 μm for the wild-type interaction. (SeeFIGS. 30a and 30b )

EXAMPLE 24 Production and Testing of Further High Affinity A6 TCRs

Soluble TCRs containing the following mutations corresponding to thoseidentified in clones 89, 1, 111 and 71 (see Example 8) were producedusing the methods detailed in Example 9. The binding of these solubleTCRs to HLA-A2 Tax was then assessed using the Biacore assay detailed inExample 10.

A6 TCR β chain mutants Clone CDR3 sequence WildGCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCAGAGCAGTAG Type (SEQ ID 83)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  E  Q  Y (SEQ ID 84) 89GCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCAGAGGATTAG (SEQ ID 91)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  E  D  X (SEQ ID 92) 1GCCTCGAGGCCGGGGCTGGTTCCGGGGCGACCAGAGCAGTAG (SEQ ID 97)A  S  R  P  G  L  V  P  G  R  P  E  Q  X (SEQ ID 98) 111GCCTCGAGGCCGGGACTAGCGGGAGGGCGACCACATCCGTAG (SEQ ID 101)A  S  R  P  G  L  A  G  G  R  P  H  P  X (SEQ ID 102) A6 TCR αchain mutant Clone CDR3 Wild GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGAAGCTTCAG Type(SEQ ID 107) A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  K  L  Q (SEQ ID 108) 71GCCGTTACAACTGACAGCTGGGGGGAGCTTCAT (SEQ ID 117)A  V  T  T  D  S  W  G  E  L  H (SEQ ID 118)

Combined mutations used as a basis for the production of mutated solubleA6 TCRs:

Clone 89 mutations+Clone 134 mutations

Clone 71 mutations+Clone 134 mutations

Clone 71 mutations+Clone 89 mutations

Clone 1 mutations+β102→A mutation

Results:

The following table compares the HLA-A2 Tax affinity of the abovesoluble mutated A6 TCRs to that obtained using a soluble A6 TCRcontaining unmutated variable regions. Note that the affinity of thehighest affinity mutants is expressed as the half-life for theinteraction. (T_(1/2)) These soluble mutant A6 TCRs exhibited higheraffinity for HLA-A2 Tax than the unmutated soluble A6 TCR asdemonstrated by their lower kd or longer T_(1/2) for the interaction.

FIGS. 31-37 show the Biacore traces used to calculate the affinity forHLA-A2 Tax of these soluble mutated TCRs. FIGS. 38a-e show the aminoacid sequence of the mutated A6 TCR chains.

A6 TCR Kd (μM) T_(1/2) (Secs) Wild-type 1.9 7 Clone 1 810 Clone 89 0.41Clone 111 1.18 Clone 71 1.37 Clone 89 + Clone 134  114 (phase 1)mutations 4500 (phase 2) Clone 71 + Clone 134 882 mutations Clone 71 +Clone 89 0.35 mutaions Clone 1 + βG102 → A 738 mutations

EXAMPLE 25 Cell Staining Using High Affinity A6 TCR Tetramers andMonomers

T2 antigen presenting cells were incubated with β2 m (3 m/ml) pulsedwith Tax peptide at a range of concentrations (10⁻⁵-10⁻⁹M) for 90minutes at 37° C. Controls, also using T2 cells incubated with β2 m (3μg/ml), were pulsed with 10⁻⁵M Flu peptide or incubated without peptide(unpulsed). After pulsing the cells were washed in serum-free RPMI and2×105 cells were incubated with either strepavidin-linked high affinityClone 134 A6 TCR tetramer labelled with phycoerythyrin (PE). (Molecularprobes, The Netherlands) (10 m/ml) or high affinity Clone 134 A6 TCRmonomers labelled with Alexa 488 (Molecular probes, The Netherlands) for10 minutes at room temperature. After washing the cells, the binding ofthe labelled TCR tetramers and monomers was examined by flow cytometryusing a FACSVantage SE (Becton Dickinson).

Results

As illustrated in FIG. 39a specific staining of T2 cells by highaffinityA6 TCR tetramers could be observed at Tax peptide concentrationsof down to 10-9 M.

As illustrated in FIG. 39b specific staining of T2 cells by highaffinityA6 TCR monomers could be observed at Tax peptide concentrationsof down to 10-8 M.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A phage particle displaying on its surfacea dimeric T-cell receptor (dTCR) polypeptide pair, wherein the dTCRpolypeptide pair comprises a first polypeptide wherein a TCR α or δchain variable domain sequence is fused to N terminus of a TCR αchainconstant domain extracellular sequence, and a second polypeptide whereina TCR β or γ chain variable domain sequence is fused to N terminus of aTCR β chain constant domain extracellular sequence, wherein the firstand second polypeptides are linked by a disulfide bond which correspondsto a native inter-chain disulfide bond present in native dimeric αβTCRs.
 2. The phage particle of claim 1 wherein the phage particle is afilamentous phage particle.
 3. The phage particle of claim 1 or claim 2wherein C-terminus of one member of the dTCR polypeptide pair is linkedby a peptide bond to a surface exposed residue of the phage particle. 4.A diverse library of phage particles as claimed in claim
 1. 5. Thediverse library of claim 4 wherein diversity resides in the variabledomain(s) of the dTCR polypeptide pair.
 6. A method for identifying TCRswith a specific characteristic comprising subjecting the diverse libraryof phage particles displaying TCRs of claim 4 or claim 5 to a selectionprocess comprising selecting for the characteristic, and isolating phageparticles which display a TCR having the characteristic, and optionallyto an amplification process to multiply the isolated particles and/or ascreening process comprising measuring for the characteristic,identifying phage particles displaying a TCR with the characteristic andisolating the phage particles, and optionally to an amplificationprocess to multiply the isolated particles.
 7. The method of claim 6wherein the specific characteristic is increased affinity for a TCRligand.
 8. A diverse library of phage particles as claimed in claim 2.9. The diverse library of claim 8 wherein diversity resides in thevariable domain(s) of the dTCR polypeptide pair.
 10. A diverse libraryof phage particles as claimed in claim
 3. 11. The diverse library ofclaim 10 wherein diversity resides in the variable domain(s) of the dTCRpolypeptide pair.